Advertisement
Advertisement
Reader poll
Which Jayhawk's performance surprised you the most in Week 2?
- Dezmon Briscoe (146 yards receiving, TD) 4% 76 votes
- Daymond Patterson (130 yards receiving, 2 TDs) 27% 430 votes
- Todd Reesing (32-for-38, 412 yards, 3 TDs) 12% 193 votes
- Darrell Stuckey (10 tackles, 2 tackles for loss) 20% 317 votes
- Angus Quigley (15 carries, 84 yards) 26% 413 votes
- Jacob Branstetter (3 field goals) 8% 139 votes
- Other 0% 5 votes
1573 total votes.
Audio clips
KU vs. Louisiana Tech
KU rolls over LTU, 29-0
After a slow start, the Kansas Jayhawks moved to a perfect 2-0 by knocking off Louisiana Tech 29-0.
Angus Quigley says he was surprised - shocked even.
Just before the end of the first half, Kansas University football coach Mark Mangino came up to Quigley and delivered a simple message: The junior was going in at running back, and soon.
"I was kind of like, 'What? I'm just a fourth-quarter guy. What am I doing in the third quarter?'" Quigley said.
The running back answered his own question soon enough.
Quigley rushed 15 times for 84 yards in the second half, jump-starting a KU rushing attack that was stagnant through the first 30 minutes.
Before Quigley's entrance, the Jayhawks mustered just 45 yards on 17 carries.
"Without looking at the tape, I thought Angus did a lot of positive things," Mangino said. "He still looked a little high - his shoulder pads are not quite down as much as you'd like - but I thought he did a nice job of picking his way and accelerating through lanes."
It's been a long road for Quigley, who has battled injuries through his four years with the program.
He worked extra with the trainers in the summer to try to remain healthy. He also made it through what he called "the longest camp of his life."
Through it all, he knew there might not be carries left over for him, with Jake Sharp and Jocques Crawford in the same backfield. But, even after watching other backs leave KU, he never wavered in his decision to stick it out.
"When I look around and see all these guys I came in with - (Darrell) Stuckey, Kerry (Meier), Arist Wright, guys like that - I could never quit on my teammates like that," Quigley said. "If I had to play special teams here for five years, six years, whatever, that's what I would do. I've never been a quitter."
The Jayhawks are glad he's still around. Through two games, he has been KU's most effective runner.
It hasn't been close, either.
Quigley has 21 carries for 131 yards, good for a 6.2-yard average. Sharp (3.2 yards per carry) and Crawford (2.7 ypc) remain a good distance behind despite having fewer carries.
"He hit his holes, and he's got the size and strength to really get those yards after contact," KU quarterback Todd Reesing said. "He's proven that."
But can he perform like that in the first half? Or even as a starter?
Those are questions that Mangino surely will be asked leading up to his team's game with South Florida this week.
"It's really up to the coaching staff. I have no say in (playing time)," Quigley said. "If the coaches say I deserve some first-half carries, I will gladly accept those first-half carries. I will take them running.
"I'm just running with it, man. That's all I can do right now."
KU vs. Louisiana Tech: Postgame
- Dugan Arnett's quick hits (9-7-08)
- Tech wastes chances (9-7-08)
- Reesing throws for career-best 412 yards; KU defeats Louisiana Tech, 29-0 (9-7-08)
- Keegan: Stuckey simply gets it (9-7-08)
- Reesing throws Jayhawks to victory (9-7-08)
- Keegan Ratings: Todd Reesing takes top honor
- KU football notebook (9-7-08)
- Game balls Gassers (9-7-08)
- KU-LTU Box Score
- 2008-09 Schedule
- 2008-09 Roster
- 2008-09 Depth Chart
- More football coverage »
More like this
- Dugan Arnett's quick hits 4 comments / September 7, 2008
- Game balls Gassers 10 comments / September 7, 2008
- KU football notebook September 7, 2008
- Keegan: Stuckey simply gets it 14 comments / September 7, 2008
- Tech wastes chances September 7, 2008













Comments
JBurtin (anonymous) says...
It's getting hard to call it a fluke that Quigley always seems to make great yardage when he's out there.Some of it can be attributed to tired defenses, but I also saw him turn a complete lack of a hole into a four yard gain. The guy just has a nose for how to get up field and deliver the knockout blow.I think he's earned himself a shot.
September 7, 2008 at 4:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
springtxhawk (anonymous) says...
Uh, coach.....Quigley's the best back in this offense right now. Put him in the game. Sharp is what he is. Too small to be a feature back. And, so far Crawford doesn't have any wow factor. From reading all the pre season hype, I was expecting a real explosive first step thru the hole. It may be there, but haven't seen it yet. Until we do, Quigley should be the guy.2-0 is great, but if this team doesn't figure out how to run the ball, we will not win many conference games. One dimensional offense in the Big 12 means bad record and dead quarterback. Reesing is going to get killed without a running game.
September 7, 2008 at 6:08 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
K_Easthouse (anonymous) says...
I'm going to preach quiet optimism with this guy for now, but let's think about the situation for a second.The majority (if not all) of Quigley's runs have been in the 3rd or 4th quarters, when it's clear we're effective with the throw and have lit up the scoreboard considerably by then.Teams likely will have moved away from stacking the box to spreading out and defending the run less and the pass more. It would be immensely easier to run effectively when defenses are focused on the passing game late in the game. That's why it's important we have a balanced offense; so defenses can't focus on one aspect of your game.Perhaps Quigley should get a few carries earlier in the game to see how things go. I haven't been able to see either game yet on TV (silly FSN) so I can't say how things look. I'll trust Mangino's judgment on who is best to fill in the needs during this week.
September 7, 2008 at 7:29 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
troutsee (anonymous) says...
I have been saying for a month now that Quigley should be the starter. Sharp is quick but not elusive, good straight ahead speed, but he'll need a wide open field to go the distance. Crawford has not impressed me at all. I know Quigley has been in only against "tired" defenses but I like his determination and he seems to know how to run to daylight. He reminds me of Cornish. Let's play him.
September 7, 2008 at 8:24 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rockchalks7 (anonymous) says...
A Jon Cornish clone and he seemed to do pretty well here at KU so let the kid play.
September 7, 2008 at 9:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JayViking (anonymous) says...
A lot can be attributed to more tired defenses and more spread defensive packages..but the one thing I can say that makes me think he'd be just as effective early is that when he gets hit he carries the crowd of defenders with him. Dude gets hit and takes 4 defenders with him.
September 7, 2008 at 12:16 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rolo2383 (anonymous) says...
Crawford makes one cut and then slams into whoever is in front of him. I have yet to see him make a second cut to avoid tacklers who are more than three yards down the field.I could tell two years ago during the spring game that Quigley had natural talent. He doesn't look like he's fast but neither did Cornish. When each stride is ten yards long you don't need to look like you are fast. My guess is Quigley doesn't start Friday but the leashes on Crawford and Sharp are very short.
September 7, 2008 at 12:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Jayhawk86 (anonymous) says...
Easthouse, you are right on the money. As I sat in the stands, I pointed out to my buddy that La. Tech was putting 8-9 guys in the box in the first half. Only after Reesing lit them up, did Quigly come in and face a reasonable 5-6 guys in the box. Makes for much easier running.
September 7, 2008 at 3:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
fabolous_bg (anonymous) says...
Ground Beef needs more carries
September 7, 2008 at 6:21 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )