Advertisement

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Keegan

Keegan: Defense, not QB, to blame

Adobe Flash player 9 is required to view this video
Get Adobe Flash player

More than 48 hours have passed since the Kansas football team went down to the wire with South Florida. And regardless of KU's 37-34 defeat, Friday night's performance from quarterback Todd Reesing will be a topic at the water-coolers for many weeks to come.

Advertisement

— Quarterback Todd Reesing didn't lose the game Friday night for Kansas University. Instead, he almost won it, amid a swarming rush, without any running game to speak of and with very little help from a defense exposed from front to back.

That's the only reasonable way to look at Reesing's night, which ended with an interception that led to the game-winning field goal for the University of South Florida, 37-34 victors in a game that gave a national television audience a month's worth of thrills.

"There are issues we need to deal with, and one of them is not Todd," Kansas coach Mark Mangino said of the quarterback who rallied his team to a tie from a two-touchdown deficit.

The most troubling issue involved a defense that enabled South Florida to reel off 31 consecutive points.

From the second quarter on, quarterback Matt Grothe shredded a KU defense that had not given up a touchdown in the first two weeks of the season. Grothe threw for 338 yards, including 204 yards and two touchdowns in the second half.

Grothe, who got off to a slow start in the accuracy department, found his mark in the second quarter and was on the money the rest of the night. He is a mobile quarterback, but for most of the night he didn't have a chance to show that.

As the game wore on, KU's defensive line had the look of a heavyweight boxer trying to hang on until the final bell but wobbling because of all those shots to the body. It looked at once young and tired.

"We have to be able to get to the quarterback with the four-man rush," Mangino said. "We're not doing that. We're not getting there. When we have to bring five or six, that means we have to man up in some situations. And we really don't want to man up with a couple of younger kids in the secondary. They're not ready for that. We have to be able to put some pressure on the quarterback with four guys."

The defensive tackles are big, but young. Their bodies haven't matured to the point they will when they're seniors, and neither has their know-how. The ends lack size.

The secondary play against South Florida's fleet receivers wasn't much better.

"One of the things I did not like about our defense is, I thought we weren't aggressive in the secondary, playing the ball at its highest point," Mangino said. "We played cautious and let them catch the ball and then tackled them. You can't do that. You've got to contest the ball. We did not contest the ball as well as we normally do. We'll find out why, and we'll do what we have to do."

The issues with the secondary appear more correctable than the shortcomings of the D-line, a little shy on talent on the outside and short on experience on the inside.

It didn't help that the defense had to spend so much time on the field in the third quarter. A more balanced offense - Kansas averaged 2.9 yards per carry and rushed for just 61 yards - would have benefited KU's defense.

For all the warts that were exposed, one reality bodes well for Kansas. Even when the Jayhawks get knocked down, Reesing's relentless aggressiveness and confidence will make them awfully tough to knock out.

More like this

Comments

eastcoasthawk (anonymous) says...

Overall, we battled as best we could. I'm thinking the coaches would like to play that 3rd quarter over again. I was wondering if the difference in the 3rd was the coaching, the players or even the weather?On D - Would Young have thrown some cornerback blitzes on a 4 or 5 wide out set? Would he have told the backs to tighten up coverage on 3rd down and play the line? While Barfield seems like a weak link right now and USF played that, it didn't matter in the 3rd. Thornton got beat bad also. It was a battle. We were in it. Todd just lofted a high fly ball to the centerfielder on the second to last play.Proud of the way the team came back. Proud to be a Jayhawk! We have plenty more games to go and I am looking forward to attending my second bowl game in a row! Rock Chalk!

September 13, 2008 at 6:04 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

njjayhawk (anonymous) says...

Sorry, but this KU team is only a little better than a .500 team over the remainder of the season: OU, Texas, TT, Missouri, Nebraska (there)- don't see any wins there. Too many glaring weaknesses: the defensive line and the offensive line. The defensive secondary was surprisely ineffective, too. I really thought we would be better in that area.USF is not that good; they're simply not. I watch a lot of college football, and USF is middle-of-the-pack. Solid, but not Top 20.Before the season, I thought an 8-4 season was about right for KU, considering the competition this year and the personnel losses we endured from last year. I now think 7-5 seems about right. I believe we will lose one game we shouldn't (ksu, isu, cu) and we will not win any games we realistically should not win (OU, Texas, TT). That will land us in a decent bowl. We will need to re-tool from there.Let's hope Reesing does not get injured this season - if he does, we're toast.

September 13, 2008 at 6:46 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

20jayhawk05 (anonymous) says...

I still think 8-4 is about right for us. Our D was totally gassed for most of the third quarter. Our OL killed us in the third, and our inability to get anything going on the ground hurt, too. You think at home we wont make a few more plays? I sure do. Our line can be good, but they are young. They need to mature, and the only way that will happen is experience.Even still, from the end of the second quarter until the start of the 4th, we did just about everything wrong you could think of, on the road against a good, extremely fast and atheltic team, and lost on a last second field goal.I'd say we're better than a .500 team.

September 13, 2008 at 6:53 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

leikness (anonymous) says...

Kicker to blame...you can't let the other team start every possession at the 35 or better and expect to win. If anything kills KU this year, this will be what does. If there is anything that can be done to fix this I hope Mangino finds it.

September 13, 2008 at 7:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

KU (anonymous) says...

I thought the USF crowd was a huge factor in giving USF energy in that third quarter. They were loud and it boosted their players.Here's a challenge to KU's fans who attend home games: I know most of you are relatively "new" football fans, but so are USF's fans. Football is not played in a library. It is OK to use your outdoor voice and make some noise when the other team has the ball!

September 13, 2008 at 8:43 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

areyouserious (anonymous) says...

I put this solely on Clint Bowen..............no adjustments made the entire 3rd quarter. No blitz, no heavy rush, too much zone pass defense. A good QB will pick that mess apart anyday!! If this Continues.......Mizzou will hammer us, along with many other big 12 opponents. Clint Bowen was a "marginable at best" selection for the D-Cordinator.

September 13, 2008 at 9:10 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

stupidmichael (anonymous) says...

Kansas has played La-Tech & Florida International at home so far... The crowd will show up when it needs to show up. It's just like basketball... The crowd is there when it needs to be.

September 13, 2008 at 9:13 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

patton6 (anonymous) says...

@ areyouserious - Clearly no one is happy with the defensive performance, especially in the third. But you no absolutely nothing about football if you don't think the d was doing different things, specifically blitzing and playing man at times.

September 13, 2008 at 10:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

crzykufan987 (anonymous) says...

I don't know if I would say we're only a .500 team the rest of the way. Honestly, I could see our Hawks going on to 10-2 from here and competing for a BCS. In the first half we played like a heavyweight that could knock off an OU team. Just give the O-line a few more games to develope and we'll be there.

September 13, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JHWKNMIZRY (anonymous) says...

We dropped a few passes too. I think we'll cut out some of the mistakes and get better for it.

September 13, 2008 at 11:13 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BigD (anonymous) says...

crzy, one could also make the statement that we looked good in the first half because USF wasn't playing nearly as hard as they were the rest of the game. USF looked lackluster in the first half as we did in the 3rd quarter. We beat two really bad teams at home by roughly 30 points. That is not a team that can go 10-2 and possibly beat OU. Our weak points are on both sides of the line. It generally takes more than one season to get better at those areas. We will be fortunate to win 7 games this year at this point. While we should be ISU, playing in Aames is rarely easy and NU in Lincoln will want payback.

September 13, 2008 at 11:16 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

jkilgore (anonymous) says...

I hate to lose a game we could have won too, but it sure is nice for a team that is rebuilding in key positions to be competitive. Can you imagine how good our two freshman tackles will be by the end of the season? And beyond?I LOVE Mangino's call for a deep throw. He is exactly right. You play to win. We're not used to being in that position, so it's easy to second-guess. And I disagree with those who see 7-5. We have every reason to believe that we can win at home against UT and TT. The atmosphere will be in our favor. Their home crowd had a lot to do with the win. I am proud of our kids--yes, it did take too long to shut down SF, but then, they ARE in the Top 20. Stay on the bandwagon. Never give in. Never give up. This is going to be an exciting team on every play this season! i am grateful for that!Rock Chalk, Jayhawk!!

September 13, 2008 at 11:54 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

speckleddog (anonymous) says...

"we really don't want to man up with a couple of younger kids in the secondary. They're not ready for that."What?!? They aren't ready to run the zone. Which is worse, to lose running a bad zone or to lose learning to play man to man. They still have to learn.This was a great college football game. And to lose only by three is not something to be ashamed of. But i have to agree with areyouserious. Our failure to adjust the pass coverage cost us this game. And our failure to play Quigley in the first half did not help.

September 13, 2008 at 2 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

LAJayhawk (anonymous) says...

"And our failure to play Quigley in the first half did not help."I disagree. I don't think that would have made that big of a difference. Crawford had a few nice runs, but, more importantly, he did a very good job of doubling up Selvie. However, Angus clearly should be picking up some more time.Really it was the defense in the third quarter. Granted the offense looked stalled and out of sync for most of the third, but the defense looked like it was standing still. Luckily we have some less talented teams coming up to try and iron out some of these defensive deficiencies.And I still think 8 and 4 is the worst we'll end up. I have a feeling we can pull of 9 and 3 with some inspired play. It all depends on how this loss soaks in. We learn from it or we fall apart.

September 13, 2008 at 2:56 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Hawkish4bigM (anonymous) says...

I have to say that my complaint about the deep throw is not aimed at Todd. He is a great, great asset. He always plays his heart out and in my mind is the best KU QB ever and currently one of the best in the nation. Give him more time to make pump fakes, look offs, etc. and he could throw for 500 a game. I like Big M's comments. Way too conservative on the scondary. There were times that it sure looked like we were playing zone if we weren't. I think I would have liked to see us try three down linemen since we weren't getting much of a rush anyway.Unless there are coaching changes mid-year. I see KU falling fast. This defense will not stop much of anything. Hate to say if fans but I count 6 losses unless there are coaching changes now. And you and I know that will not happen.

September 13, 2008 at 4:13 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Hawkish4bigM (anonymous) says...

Our chances of winning these tough games the way things look:10% Missouri is probably best team in country10% Oklahoma30% Texas40% Texas Tech50% Kansas State50% Colorado50% NebraskaOf these last five I figure we will lose 3, and definitely to OU and MU. Guys, we will not hang 79 on NU this year and don't forget they put 38? against us with a better defense.From 12-1 to 6-6. Well, coach M, I believe in you and I hope you have the guts to do what needs to be done. I'd hate to see you bashed at the end of the year.

September 13, 2008 at 4:29 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

hawk87 (anonymous) says...

I find it interesting that KU nation comes up in arms about a close loss to a quality team, on the third game of the season. We all have watched Sportscenter highlights of other teams experiencing what the 'hawks did last night: a late turnover, eventually leading to a game clinching fieldgoal for the opponents. Focusing on the small and negative details will do know one good but the coaches and players. This team is young and inexperienced on both the D and O Lines but will get better as the season goes on. To attempt to predict the likelihood of us beating any given Big XII team is ridiculous. Fans need to stop blaming anyone and everyone for this loss, focus on the coming weeks, and remember how lucky we are to have a football team that is even capable of garnering national attention.

September 14, 2008 at 12:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

prairie_dog (anonymous) says...

In the big picture, this team has more talent than last year's team but our inexperience is killing us. Thus, the distribution on what could happen (barring key injuries etc) is wider this year than usual. 7-5 maybe if we can't get any breaks and don't improve, 9-3 if we get our sh** together.Which will it be? That's why we have the Buddha. Our chances of coming out on the high end of this are better with Buddha.Playing in our conference does not help, maybe not the SEC from top-to-bottom, but every bit as tough at the top.

September 14, 2008 at 6:42 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JBurtin (anonymous) says...

Not that worried about the loss. I think it needed to happen to get some of the young guys playing harder from start to finish.I'm just glad we lost an early matchup to a team out of conference instead of playing four lackluster teams to start the year, beating them in unimpressive fashion, and getting hammered in Big Twelve play.I don't think that the KU basketball team would have won the national championship last year without the bad taste in their mouths from being the first KU team to lose at Bramlage. Coming off of a year where they rattled off 11 straight wins, I think they needed some grounding to get them focused. I hope this loss tastes as bad to them as it should. We had more than enough talent on this team to take South Florida to the woodshed, and just didn't get it done.P.S. Anyone calling for Bowen's head after one bad quarter of defense needs a bullet between the eyes to put them out of everyone else's misery. The offense got three and outs every time they got the ball that quarter. Of course the defense was tired and looked slow. They were worn the hell out.There was a significant pause between the third and fourth quarter, then the offense held on to the ball for a good sustained drive, and when the defense came back out they looked fine.At least learn something about the game of football before you shoot your mouth off about something that stupid.

September 14, 2008 at 7:32 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

thiknthinhawk (anonymous) says...

jburtin- excellent points, all. Bowen will prove these naysayers are making uninformed comments. The offense left the defense on the field way too long. The loss will prove to be the best thing that has happened to this team- they'll grow and silence the bandwagon jump shippers. Mark my words- we'll be in a great bowl. I for one love the fact that we are now back in the underdog role- people will again underestimate us! The young players will be forced to play harder, and Reesing will work even harder to prove he's a Heisman candidate. People better be ready- he's such a competitor that this will make him even more determined to kick butts. The lines are talented- and Mangenius isn't Mangenius for nothing- it'll happen. Thick n thin, baby!!

September 14, 2008 at 3:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

ttoulouse (anonymous) says...

Well, here's to hanging 70 on Sam Houston for posterity.

September 14, 2008 at 8:28 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

dagger108 (anonymous) says...

There is a nice article in either the Tampa Bay/StPete paper about how the O's & D's were playing and changing throughout the game. It reinforced my concern during the game that the OC & DC didn't make on the fly adjustments quickly enough. 3 dominant series in a row on both sides of the ball is just too much without correcting - which they were fully capable of doing.The schedule works in our favor as there are 4 weeks of generally increasing competition, then comes the gauntlet.I predict we wil be vastly improved by 10/18. Maybe not enough that day, but certainly enough for the home dates and even a road date or 2.

September 15, 2008 at 3:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Phogfan86 (anonymous) says...

"Crawford had a few nice runs, but, more importantly, he did a very good job of doubling up Selvie."I couldn't disagree more. Jocques Crawford is a terrible, terrible blocker. Even if he got run over or pushed backwards, he'd be in a rusher's way. Instead, he whiffs. A guy as freakishly athletics as Crawford shouldn't whiff. He got a little chippy block in on Selvie a couple of times, but look at the tape of the previous two games. His blocking is abysmal.Quigley's not the best RB on the team, but his patience at waiting for holes to open plus his ability to move a pile when nothing opens up are best suited to an o-line that can't move anyone right now.

September 17, 2008 at 7:40 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

springtxhawk (anonymous) says...

Wow. Lots of analysis. I am just coming up for air after Hurricane Ike so forgive me for the rehash, but.......Mangino is obviously smarter than I am, but I absolutely don't understand why "The Angus" isn't playing more. Love the guys tough running.Agree with previous comment, Crawford is a horrible blocker and not much better at carrying the ball. Where is this freakish athlete? Spring football doesn't count for much. I see nothing.Mr. Keegan, I told you before the season I was losing sleep for two reasons, 1. two new tackles and 2. No more B Mac.I remain sleepless in Houston. Our running game is HO rendous!! Reesing is a stud, but he is DEAD man walking if we cannot run the dadgum football, sorry no more Roy ism's this hurricane has gotten to my head.Not sure about Clint Bowen, but I will say this, if you can't hit the QB with 4, you gotta hit him with 5 or 6, period. If a QB can stand flat footed in the pocket, he will succeed.Hope we play much better, season young, but we need to improve quickly as many have pointed out, the way we played friday night, there aren't too many gimme's on our schedule.Oh, btw, the true freshman made a few HUGE mistakes and what is up with Dez Briscoe?? somebody tell me he had the flu on Friday because he was horrible.

September 17, 2008 at 10:11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )