Woodling: KU needs to solve free-throw woes

By Chuck Woodling     Dec 31, 2004

If you’re looking for a rationalization about the lack of a playoff system in NCAA Div. I-A football, dig no deeper than season finales.

In football, a large number of teams actually can end the season with a win and reflect fondly on that victory for months and months to come.

However, very few teams in the NCAA sports with postseason playoffs end their seasons on happy notes. Of the 64 schools that earn berths in basketball, soccer, volleyball etc., 63 always wind up losers.

That’s been the case more often than not for Kansas University men’s basketball over the last three decades. KU hasn’t ended with a win since capturing the NCAA championship in 1988. Prior to that, the Jayhawks hadn’t had a season-ending victory since 1976 — a year they finished 13-13 and didn’t qualify for the postseason.

Memories of recent basketball season finales still haunt KU fans.

Three years ago in Atlanta, Kansas committed a season-high 27 fouls and Maryland converted 26 of 35 free-throw attempts for a 97-88 win in the Final Four semis.

Two years ago in New Orleans, Kansas went flat at the free-throw line, missing 18 of 30 charities, in bowing to Syracuse, 81-78, in the NCAA championship game.

And in March in St. Louis, Georgia Tech denied KU a third straight Final Four berth with a 79-71 overtime triumph fueled by 26-of-34 shooting at the foul stripe.

Do you see the pattern? Can’t miss it, can you? Free-throw shooting.

With Georgia Tech coming Saturday to Allen Fieldhouse, I went to the archives for a retrospective on the March meeting in the Edward Jones Dome.

Let’s see … the Jayhawks started in a frozen state, missing 16 of their first 18 shots. Check.

But after trailing by as many as 11 points in the first half, KU forced overtime when J.R. Giddens drilled a long three-pointer with :16.4 showing. Check.

Keith Langford hit two free throws to start the OT, but fouled out on a suspicious whistle — Langford called it “a horrible call” and later was reprimanded — several seconds later, and the Jayhawks scored only three points the rest of the way. Check.

Yet I couldn’t find one sentence about the free throw disparity. No scribe — and I’m as guilty as anybody — wrote that the Yellowjackets had twice as many free throws as the Jayhawks who were 13 of 19 at the foul line.

Sure, there was a lot to write about — there always is in an overtime game — but more should have been written about how Tech’s deadly charity shooting doomed the Jayhawks to their 16th straight season-ending defeat.

Guard Jarrett Jack was the ringleader. Jack had half of the Yellowjackets’ 26 free throws, missing only once in 14 launches from the stripe.

Free throws were the difference, all right … as they often are when two teams of equal caliber step on the floor. Prior to the meeting in St. Louis, Georgia Tech was ranked No. 14 in the polls and Kansas No. 16.

Saturday, Kansas (8-0) will await the tipoff ranked No. 2. Georgia Tech (9-1) is No. 9, but probably should be ranked higher.

Will free-throw shooting be the difference again?

If so, then the Yellowjackets will have the advantage because KU will be without Wayne Simien, the Jayhawks’ best free-throw shooter. Arguably the best shooting big man in school history at the stripe, Simien had made 29 of 33 charities (87.9 percent) before being sidelined because of a thumb injury.

Meanwhile, Simien’s teammates have been shooting a tepid and unfathomable 57.6 percent at the foul line. It’s a cinch Kansas won’t remain No. 2 for long with that kind of lackluster free-throw shooting.

If the Jayhawks are going to pick up the slack with Simien on the shelf indefinitely, the place to start is you-know-where.

Woodling: KU needs attitude overhaul to beat KSU

By Chuck Woodling     Oct 22, 2003

A few people — not a lot, but a few — called the Journal-World sports department this week to ask if Saturday’s Kansas-Kansas State football game would be televised.

It won’t be, not even on pay-per-view, but the mere fact a few Kansas fans want to watch the Jayhawks play the Wildcats on TV is at least a sign some believe K-State’s decade-long dominance of the Sunflower State series might be on the wane.

If you based Saturday’s game strictly on numbers, you would think the game should be a toss-up. Kansas is 5-2 and Kansas State is 5-3. Both teams received three votes in this week’s Associated Press poll. And yet the Wildcats are listed as roughly a three-touchdown favorite. Why is that? No doubt because of the ‘Cats’ total dominance over the last five years.

The realists — the people who know about college football and how it works — will have to be shown that Kansas won’t stick its tail between its legs and crawl away from the Wildcats. That’s been the Jayhawks’ recent history in this series, you know.

Kansas State has waxed Kansas mostly through intimidation.

Coaches won’t talk about the intimidation factor for public consumption and neither will players, but it’s there hovering over the Jayhawks like a nagging toothache, an albatross of immense unseen proportions.

In contemporary times, the defining moment of the Kansas-Kansas State series occurred Oct. 31, 1998, at Memorial Stadium.

On the first play of KU’s second series, quarterback Zac Wegner was sandwiched by K-State linebackers Jeff Kelly and Travis Litton. Wegner suffered a broken, split middle finger on his left (nonthrowing) hand — an ugly wound — as well as a concussion. Wegner’s season was over.

Kansas State sent a message that day, and Kansas read it loud and clear. Since then, the average score of the series has been: Kansas State 52, Kansas 7.

When Lew Perkins was named the Jayhawks’ athletic director last spring, he mentioned how he thought Kansas had lost its swagger, how the Jayhawks seemed resigned to their fate as also-rans in everything except men’s basketball. No more so than in the football series with Kansas State.

I’ll never forget the evening of Oct. 7, 2000. Kansas State had just whipped up on the Jayhawks, 52-13, at Memorial Stadium and KU coach Terry Allen allowed as how he was “disappointed” about the lopsided defeat — his third straight in which the ‘Cats had scored at least 50 points.

Disappointed? Allen had just been squashed for a purple hat trick and he was disappointed? He should have been infuriated. He should have vowed right then and there it would never happen again.

Hangover from that mentality led to Kansas State’s 64-0 pummeling of the Jayhawks under Mark Mangino last year in Lawrence. On that day, KSU coach Bill Snyder, reinforcing the intimidation factor, sent his first-string defenders on the field late to preserve the shutout.

Under Snyder, Kansas State has approached the Kansas game with the attitude the Sunflower State belongs to them. You want it, Kansas? Just try and take it away from us. This land is ours. Take it away from us at your own risk. On the flip side, KU’s approach has been: “Gee, I hope we don’t get beat too bad and we don’t get anybody hurt.”

Kansas has to change its attitude, and, if nothing else, the Jayhawks need to send a message to Kansas State, saying in effect: “We’re mad as hell, and we’re not going to take it anymore.”

Until Kansas matches Kansas State on the swagger level, the beat will go on.

PREV POST

Trade reunites LaFrentz with Pierce in Boston

NEXT POST

4535Woodling: KU needs attitude overhaul to beat KSU