Instant replay officiating – like it or not – is coming to Big 12 Conference football this fall.
“The way it’s set up,” Kansas University football coach Mark Mangino said a couple of weeks ago, “I’m very comfortable with it.”
Mangino may be comfortable with the system, but the fourth-year KU coach made it clear at Tuesday morning’s Chamber of Commerce breakfast he was not a ringleader in instant replay adoption.
When one of the attendees of the Breakfast of Champions event at the Hereford House asked Mangino about it, Mangino pulled few punches.
“Early on, I told them I’m old school, that we don’t need it,” Mangino said. “They don’t use it in baseball. I’m a baseball guy, and I believe in the human factor part of the game.”
Mangino also stressed there was nothing instant about instant replay and he didn’t relish the prospect of standing on the sidelines for two, three or four minutes waiting for a judgment from the press box official who will call stoppages and make the final decisions.
“I don’t want anything to slow the game down,” Mangino said. “With all the passing these days and stopping the clock after first downs, the games are marathons.”
Indeed, the Jayhawks were involved in three games last season that lasted 31â2 hours or longer, including the Texas Tech nail-biter that concluded 15 minutes shy of four hours. Only two of the Jayhawks’ 11 outings last fall were completed in less than three hours.
Still, Mangino said while he may not like instant replay, he could live with it.
“I think it will be helpful, I really do,” he said.
Save $5,000?
In fact, a review official in the press box may have helped Kansas defeat Texas last season and, at the same time, may have saved Mangino $5,000.
After Texas had staged a remarkable comeback Nov. 13 at Memorial Stadium and salvaged a 27-23 victory – thanks in large part to a suspicious call and a suspect no-call – Mangino went ballistic, ripped the officiating and later was saddled with a five-grand fine by the league office.
To refresh your memory, the suspicious call was offensive pass interference against KU’s Charles Gordon. The suspect no-call occurred earlier. Texas tailback Cedric Benson appeared to fumble near the Longhorns’ goal, but the officials ruled he was down. A replay on the stadium’s video board seemed to show otherwise.
Not too long ago, Big 12 commissioner Kevin Weiberg said the Big 12 had studied tape of 14,000 plays during last season’s league games. Of that number, he said, only 34 calls were deemed reviewable and just eight or nine would have been overturned.
Weiberg didn’t list those eight or nine plays, but Benson’s phantom fumble surely was one of them. Notably, however, the offensive pass interference flag against Gordon was not reviewable because it was a judgment call and judgment calls cannot be altered.
Turning the tide
During the post-breakfast question-and-answer session, Mangino also was asked how the Jayhawks did in their head-to-head recruiting battle against Kansas State.
“We’re turning the tide,” Mangino replied. “There are 2.5 million people in the state, and we don’t have a lot of recruits, four or five if we’re lucky. But everybody we went after we got except a young man who went to Oklahoma.”
Mangino was referring to Brody Eldridge, a linebacker from Prairie View High in LaCygne.
Another questioner asked about the number of players Mangino has on scholarship.
“The limit is 85, and we’re at about 80,” he answered. “When you’re rebuilding, it takes time to reach 85 after the early attrition. To get to 85 will take, I think, a couple of more years.”
Not surprisingly, Mangino was asked about the duel between Adam Barmann and Jason Swanson for the quarterback job this fall.
“Nothing has changed since the spring,” Mangino said. “Competition will make them better. They’re talented. It’s just a matter of putting it together.”
Mangino was not asked, but he did address the controversial issue of playing Oklahoma in Arrowhead Stadium this fall. Many Lawrence merchants aren’t happy about KU playing a home game off-campus for the first time since 1947.
Mangino stated in defense of the K.C. shift that he rather would play Oklahoma in Arrowhead than play a nonconference game on the road.
“The revenue from the Oklahoma game will pay to bring another nonconference game here,” he said. “And chances are one of the nonconference games would have been on the road, and the fans in Lawrence would have lost out anyhow.”
Speech excerpts
Here are some other highlights from Mangino’s speech :
¢ On depth: “Our first-line guys are pretty good, but we don’t have many kids to rotate. We’re playing with the same guys in the fourth quarter we played in the first quarter. We have more depth this year, but not what we’d like to have.”
¢ On the three nonconference home games: “I know some are not household names, but we don’t take anybody for granted at Kansas. We can’t do that. We’re not Oklahoma, and we’re not Texas. We can’t just show up and win.”
¢ On losing: “When I came to KU I wasn’t aware of all these losing streaks. What is Nebraska now : 38 years? We’ll try to get that stopped.” (Note: KU actually has lost 36 in a row to the Cornhuskers).
¢ On who will win the Big 12 North: “I don’t have any predictions. I don’t do that. But I’m confident. We’ll be strong on defense and improved on offense. It’ll be an exciting season.”
I arrived home Saturday night in a college football bizzaro world. That night on Sportscenter, Kansas football was one of the lead stories. Granted, it had little to do with what happened on the field the Jayhawks blew another fourth quarter lead and fell to Texas but instead, focused on Mark Mangino’s postgame comments. On the busiest college football day of the year, it was Mangino who stole all the thunder. Simply put, Saturday’s [postgame press conference][1] was one of the most bizarre things I’ve ever seen. There was Mangino, standing in front of the smallest media gathering of the season, begging us to ask him about the officiating, specifically on a questionable offensive pass interference call on Charles Gordon. “Don’t you guys with any opinions have any questions about how this game turned out?” Mangino asked. He knew exactly what he was doing when he opened the can of worms heard around the world. “You know what this is about, don’t you?” Mangino said. “BCS. That’s what made the difference today in the game. That’s what made the difference in the call in front of their bench. Dollar signs.” ![][2] Four days have passed, and I have yet to make up my mind on Mangino’s comments. On one hand, I admire the head coach for sticking up for his players after a terribly officiated contest. On the other hand, I was troubled by his inability to accept any responsibility for blowing the ten point lead. After all, the officials didn’t allow Vince Young to scramble for 20 yards on fourth and 18. I have no big problem with the remarks. What I do have a problem with is how Mangino has since retracted and backed off his statements. Jeff Gordon couldn’t go in reverse as fast as Mangino did on Saturday. One point that not everyone knows is how premeditated his BCS theory was. Nearly an hour elapsed from the time the call was made on Saturday until the time Mangino met with the media. There was plenty of time for Mangino to think through his postgame comments, and edit out anything he would regret. By his begging, it was abundantly clear that he truly believed what he was saying. The tone of his voice and the direction of the press conference made it clear that he had similar thoughts prior to Saturday. On Saturday night, the backtracking began immediately. A formal apology was sent out to the media, and was read on ESPN by 10 p.m. On Sunday, Mangino [continued to apologize][3] for his comments. This afternoon at his weekly press conference, he decided to skirt the issue, telling the media that he doesn’t want to talk about it anymore. It’s too bad, really, because this week’s backtracking is unlike anything we’ve ever seen from the man who is single-handedly dragging this program from the depths of the Terry Allen era. One of Mangino’s most endearing traits is his ability to make opinions and follow them through without conviction. He’s done it with players, kicking off several seedy characters because they didn’t fit with his philosophy. On Saturday, he made an opinion on Big 12 officiating, and followed it through with his postgame comments. I admire his statements, even if I don’t completely agree with them. However, if you’re going to say it, see it through until the bitter end. Saturday could have been a great day in the history of KU football. Now, the only memory I have of the weekend is a head coach with his tail between his legs.**One More Random Note:** Did you see the [Virgin Mary grilled cheese][4] on E-Bay? Anybody who would pay $79,000 for this is in need of some serious help.**Week Twelve Picks: Kansas 35, Missouri 14:** Jayhawk fans, it’s time to climb aboard the Brian Luke bandwagon. Tiger fans, it’s time to jump off Gary Pinkel’s. **Chiefs 24, Patriots 23:** One last gasp for the 2004 Chiefs on Monday Night Football. **Upset Special: Alabama 31, Auburn 21** The Crimson Tide does the BCS a favor.**Big Tex Kevin Romary’s Picks Kansas 21, Missouri 17:** You think Coach Mangino said some off the wall comments last week? Check out Gary Pinkels file! **Patriots 31, Chiefs 28:** Gunther, Gunther, Gunther:..unbelievable. **Upset Special: Iowa State 17, Kansas State 13** Some call them the Cyclones. Others call them the Big 12 North champs. [1]: http://www.kusports.com/news/football/story/112127 [2]: http://www.kusports.com/football/roster/coaches/art/mangino.jpg [3]: http://www.kusports.com/news/football/story/112116 [4]: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5535890757