Advertisement

Friday, May 21, 2021

NCAA’s D1 Council hopes athlete pay rules hashed out in June

In this March 14, 2012, file photo, a player runs across the NCAA logo during practice in Pittsburgh before an NCAA tournament college basketball game. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, File)

In this March 14, 2012, file photo, a player runs across the NCAA logo during practice in Pittsburgh before an NCAA tournament college basketball game. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, File)

Advertisement

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The NCAA Division I Council plans to act on legislative proposals next month that would allow athletes to be paid to be sponsors, social media influencers and product endorsers, the governing body for college sports announced Wednesday.

The council will take up the issue at its meeting June 22-23 with the goal of having legislation in place by July 1. That would provide greater consistency in the name, image and likeness opportunities available to student-athletes nationally as state laws become effective on or around that date.

The Council expressed general support for amending the effective date of the proposals from Aug. 1 to July 1, or immediately if action is taken after July 1, the NCAA said in a statement.

Measures introduced in October would allow athletes to use their name, image and likeness to promote camps and clinics, private lessons, their own products and services, and commercial products or services. They also could be paid for autographs and personal appearances.

Athletes would be allowed to get professional advice and marketing assistance regarding NIL and have professional representation in contract negotiations with some restrictions.

Schools would be prohibited from arranging endorsement opportunities, and athletes would not be permitted to use their school’s logo in advertisements, endorsements, personal appearances or promotions.

Both prospective and current student-athletes would be required to disclose name, image and likeness activities, including compensation arrangements.

The NCAA has been trying to change its rules regarding NIL and compensation for athletes, but the process has bogged down under scrutiny from the Justice Department.

The NCAA is involved in a U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that could impact ways athletes can be compensated.

Dozens of states are forcing the issue with bills that will grant college athletes NIL rights as soon as this summer.

There also are efforts to put a federal law in place.

Comments

Jeff Coffman 4 months, 1 week ago

I still think that this could indirectly assist KU football. If there starts to be a desire for NIL, the value really only goes up for a starter and even that for only certain starters. If you are a high school prospect and can walk into a position at OU/Bama/ND, you are taking it. However, if you are 3 or 4th on the depth chart, but could actually make money if you are a starter at KU, all of sudden things could get interesting.

I would guess that NIL isn't going to be that lucrative for the majority of players and I also think that the monitoring costs by the NCAA is going to be ridiculous.

Anyways, I think of first/second rounders in the NFL; however, I'm not sold that this will be a spending spree like many believe it will be.

I think basketball it will be slightly more lucrative per player and that you will see about 7-9 players from each team see some type of revenue from NIL.

I'm not an expert, so always good to see other thoughts on this subject and how it will affect sports/sports recruiting/retention at a school.

Rodney Crain 4 months, 1 week ago

With the Overtime Elite league and the G league ramping up the NCAA better reinvent itself quickly on making College Basketball more attractive to the top talent. I just am not sure they are smart enough nor nimble enough to answer the call.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.