Realignment Today: What Notre Dame's move to the ACC (in everything but football and hockey) means for the Big 12


Today’s announcement that Notre Dame will move its non-football sports to the ACC has sent a large faction of Big 12 fans into a frenzy.

Although I understand why this is the case on the surface, I’m not so sure the announcement is worth getting worked up about.

For starters, it seems as if Notre Dame joining the Big 12, either entirely or as a partial member, was a longshot to begin with. There were talks and those talks were extensive, but I’ve been told that there was never a strong indication that the Fighting Irish, as things stand today, were ever really that interested in joining the Big 12.

The reasons for that are plentiful and include everything from academics and athletics to Notre Dame’s desire to maintain control.

As part of the agreement to join the ACC, Notre Dame will play five football games against ACC opponents annually but will continue to operate as an independent, which has been the school’s goal all along. That set-up is not a huge departure from what the Irish have done lately anyway. Just look at this year’s Notre Dame football schedule which includes Miami, Boston College, Wake Forest and Pitt, all schools that are in or will be in the ACC by the time Notre Dame joins.

In maintaining its independent status, the Irish not only will be able to continue their relationship with NBC, but also should be able to continue healthy rivalries with schools such as Navy, USC, Michigan State and others.

It’s a good move for the Irish and an even better move for the ACC. Looks like a win-win for both sides and, whenever that’s the case, it’s certainly hard to argue.

But enough about Notre Dame. What does all this mean for the Big 12?

In my mind, the answer to that is simple — the Big 12, as it has said for quite some time, will be staying at 10 teams for a long, long time.

There was some genuine interest in adding schools like Notre Dame or Florida State, but with those schools now off the table thanks to Notre Dame’s move to the ACC and the ACC’s simultaneous announcement that its exit fee would be increased to $50 million, those schools, along with Virginia Tech, Clemson and others now look to be off limits.

Quick sidenote: I can’t help but be mightily impressed by what the Big 12 and ACC have done in consecutive years in the face of uncertain and very dangerous futures. The Big 12 looked all but dead a year ago yet found a way to bounce back and flourish both in terms of its financial situation and its public image. Shortly after the Big 12 became more stable than ever, the ACC took its place on the chopping block and appeared to be equally as vulnerable, if not more so. Yet, here that conference is today, announcing the addition of Notre Dame and securing its future by agreeing to up its exit fee to an amount that no one would dare tangle with. Impressive.

And hopefully, just maybe, their moves can put an end to conference realignment for the foreseeable future. I won’t hold my breath on that, though.

The Big East, which has been in a tough spot all along, now becomes the most vulnerable league by far, with the Big 12, Big Ten and ACC all positioned to pick up any number of Big East defectors should it come to that. Maybe it won’t. But if the Big 12 were to make a move to expand, that’s likely where it would look.

Again, I don’t expect that to happen. I don’t think the remaining schools “out there” are impressive enough nor profitable enough for the Big 12 to want to bring them in to split the pie 12 ways instead of 10. It just doesn’t make sense to bring in schools for the sake of bringing them in when the schools you’re picking up don’t add much to the pot.

Louisville, UConn and even Rutgers all are intriguing options for various reasons, but neither of them is on par with the Notre Dames and Florida States of the world. And Big 12 leaders have said all along that it would take a special school for them to consider expanding. I don’t think the schools I mentioned above are considered special by anyone outside of their fan bases.

Adding any of those schools or a program like BYU (which isn’t happening) would not be a lucrative enough endeavor to make it worth the Big 12’s while.

I know the concept that bigger is better is tough for people to get past when it comes to realignment, but it’s important to remember that what’s good for one league isn’t necessarily what’s good for another.

The ACC now has 15 teams and the Big 12 has 10. Both appear to be stable and headed toward exciting and profitable futures. What’s wrong with that?


d_prowess 8 years, 5 months ago

Matt, do you have any sense on what the exit penalty would be for Notre Dame if they ever decide to fully (aka football included) join a conference other than the ACC? Would it also be $50 million or do they have a different out clause given that football is not included?

Matt Tait 8 years, 5 months ago

I don't think there are special rules for them regarding that. If they want out, they're gonna have to pay. And, at this point, the more likely scenario has them rolling football into the ACC, though I don't see that happening any time soon - if ever.

jhawkinsf 8 years, 5 months ago

I still have to think that it's in the conference's best interest to get back to 12 teams. That allows a football championship game, a big money maker. I have to wonder if some conference team goes undefeated and gets left out of the BCS championship because we played one less game. If that's true and the Big East seems to be falling apart, I think we should be going after Louisville for sure, and then either Cincinnati or South Florida.

LAJayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

The conference championship game is much more of a roadblock to the national championship than an aid. If you run the table, then lose the conference championship, you're out. But if you run the table in the Big 12 without the conference title game, you almost certainly will be in the new 4-team playoff structure. I can't see a scenario where that wouldn't happen. That's a big reason why Oklahoma and Texas do not want a conference championship game. Yes, it makes money, but it doesn't do much beyond that.

Again, if you go undefeated in the Big 12, you are easily going to be one of the top 4 teams in the country. No doubt about it.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

More money = Yes Easier road to the title game = No

Just ask Ohio State how that works.

Sam Brockert 8 years, 5 months ago

What is wrong with that? If we stay a ten, the big 12 dies. Plain and simple. In the current waters you are either growing or your dying. But lets face it, the real decision makers are influenced by Texas and Oklahoma. Neither one of them want to expand because it would be a harder road to the national championship. Why would those two schools care? They would be able to find homes EASILY.

Kyle Sybesma 8 years, 5 months ago

I agree. I think OU and Texas are keeping the Big 12 as small as possible to collect as much money as possible until the conference dies. They have no interest in keeping the conference alive long term. I wish KU would put themselves in an offensive position and look to move to the Big 10. Let's control our own destiny. I think Zenger knows this and that is why he is being aggressive with the football program. Fired Gill. Made announcement that Memorial Stadium would be evaluated soon.

bad_dog 8 years, 5 months ago

The evaluation is ongoing as we speak. I received and completed an extensive survey via e-mail, just yesterday. It included questions such as whether to have loge seating (#s of seats in each group, where located, indoor vs. outdoor), questions about the current restrooms/concessions, parking, prices, seat leasing, track removal, etc. There were exemplar photos from other facilities to illustrate what each amenity could look like in MS. There were also a couple of free text areas to add comments about improvements to the stadium appearance, sound system, video boards, etc. All in all I believed it was a pretty extensive survey that reflects a lot of thought about what could/should be done to MS.

FWIW, I did refer them to comments section for additional input...

Kyle Sybesma 8 years, 5 months ago

That's good to hear but as old as Memorial Stadium is I think KU should play a couple years at Arrowhead while a new stadium is built on the same location. I know it'd be expensive. I know we should have a winner on the field before an investment is made in a stadium but it's time to move forward and quit putting band-aides on a gun shot. This is not AFH. There's no tradition lost. Eventually we'll get to a point where both Memorial and AFH will need to be replaced and that'll be expensive.

kuguardgrl13 8 years, 5 months ago

There's already a field off of Crestline. The football team can trade with the marching band.

ohjayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

The big thing that is going to keep the Big 12 alive is the newly negotiated broadcast rights deal that stipulates if any member leaves within that 13 year period, the Big 12 keeps their broadcast revenues. That's not chump change, especially for the Texas' and Oklahoma's of the world. And if you don't think the current members wouldn't fight for that, tooth and nail, if it came down to it, look at what Baylor threatened to do the last go around. I think the Big 12 is solid, even if it remains at 10 schools... at least for the next 13 years anyway.

Andy Tweedy 8 years, 5 months ago

So much stuff can change in 13 years, I wouldn't worry too much about that.

Ben Kliewer 8 years, 5 months ago

But nobody knows what's going to happen in 13 years. Did you have any idea this was all going to be going on 13 years ago?

Sam Constance 8 years, 5 months ago

This is nothing but baseless doom and gloom. There is no way anyone is leaving before the current TV contract is up, given that leaving would mean leaving your TV rights on the table, which would be program suicide.

And so much can happen in 13 years, it's just ludicrous to make predictions about it. Especially with something as volatile as conference alignment.

The old "if you're not growing, you're dying" method of thinking is outdated and wrong. Growth and improvement are not synonymous.

jgkojak 8 years, 5 months ago

Big big mistake to not grab FSU and Clemson when we had the chance. Notre Dame may not have ever joined the B12, but grabbing those two would have absolutely solidified our position.

If the ACC were smart... 16 teams would be much more workable for non-football sports...

they would make a belated offer to West Virginia.

That would absolutely kill the B12.

nckujayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

Doesn't West Virginia already owes the Big 12 for paying exit fees to the Big East and they signed a 13 year grant of rights. So if WVU would want out, they repay the Big 12, pay Big 12 exit fees, and give up any TV revenue for 13 years.

Ben Kliewer 8 years, 5 months ago

We never had a real chance at FSU and Clemson.

Eric Dawson 8 years, 5 months ago

If I were the ACC I would be going after UConn before WVU. Or even Rutgers, which -- unlike Syracuse -- actually does garner a good portion of the NYC MSA for its athletics, at least for its FB program. WVU tried -- and failed due to lack of target conference interest -- to leave the Big East for either the ACC or SEC before agreeing to move to the Big 12.
If WVU would jump, the Big 12 would approach -- and almost certainly get -- WVU runnerup Louisville. The Big East is coming to an end as a major FB conference, the only question is when.

Steve Gantz 8 years, 5 months ago

What happens when you get kicked out of

John Myers 8 years, 5 months ago

Hey Matt -

Has there been any talk at all about renaming the conference? I'm fine with staying at 10 teams, but remaining the Big 12 with 10 teams drives me batty. Any consideration to changing to a name that isn't tied to a specific number?

Tony Bandle 8 years, 5 months ago

How about the Big 120/12 get to see the "12" twice and the result of the fraction is the number of teams in the conference! {PS If anyone thinks I am serious, I have some swampland in Florida for sale cheap]

Matt Tait 8 years, 5 months ago

Can't see that happening. If it was going to, it would've happened by now. Sorry.

HAWKLICIOUS 8 years, 5 months ago

From a basketball standpoint, the road to a conference championship for Notre Dame just got a little more difficult (especially with Cuse and Pitt coming to the ACC). I would think Notre Dame basketball would have a better chance of winning in the Big 12. From a football standpoint: 1). I am curious how the five teams that Notre Dame will play are determined? Certain years could be a cake walk for them. 2). The Big 12 would not have been a good fit in terms of winning for Notre Dame. Having to face UT, OU, OSU and dare I say KU ((:-) on a yearly basis could be detrimental to their record. Overall, a move to the ACC seems like a good fit for the Fighting Irish.

David Gisi 8 years, 5 months ago

ACC is a better fit for ND. But it is disappointing, because ND could have been a great fit for the Big 12, especially if more teams from the East could have been added. It was a major mistake for Big 12 to not pursue FSU and Clemson to go along with WVU. ND joined the Big East to increase recruiting access along the east coast. It was John McLeod that lead that move when he was still the bball coach. ND would not compete well in the Big 12 from a recruiting standpoint without the Big 12 having a solid east coast presence. Right now they still compete for recruits in B1G areas and east coast, while pulling a few from around the country for football. So definitely the ACC is the best fit for ND. Big 12 needed to get at least 2 prominent teams from the east to have a chance to get ND. I think ND basketball and other sports would have died in the Big 12 without an east coast presence for recruiting. But I was really hoping to see KU in south bend for some games. As far as the Big 12 goes now, it looks fine for a few years, but who really knows. If things start to push again to building 16 team superconferences, it would appear the Big 12 will be on the outside looking in.

blindrabbit 8 years, 5 months ago

KU is in a difficult time; football attendance is falling, even with talk of moderization of Memorial Stadium. Really, KU football fans are as fickle as any, have a winning season and attendance improves for a year or so, but falls off abruptly, look at attendance a year or two after bowl wins in 1991, 1993, Texas, Orange and Insight Bowls (attended the last 4). This along with a decreasing standing in academic rankings, even compared to Big 12 schools which KU used to beat out. KU is loosing any bargaining position with other conferences as athletics (except BB) and academic excellance tails off.

Ben Kliewer 8 years, 5 months ago

Did you go to KU? As wrought with misspellings and basic grammatical errors as your statement is, I would believe that the Academic standards are indeed failing.

But seriously, we are a traditional basketball powerhouse that is used to winning in that arena. You're just not going to get fans to come watch a losing football team that has no tradition. You have to build the tradition. Our 2007/08 season was a novelty, but not enough to build off of, especially with two coaching changes coming on its heels. Nobody wants to torture themselves to come watch the team get bludgeoned week after week. Weis needs to build it up, and create interest, but that's going to take time, which few on these boards seem to want to give him. As far as the academic rankings, I can't comment because I haven't looked at them recently.

Sam Constance 8 years, 5 months ago

What in the hell are you talking about? Specifically, regarding the academics.

Here are the current U.S. News & World Report rankings for the Big 12:

Texas #13

Iowa State #46 Oklahoma #46


Kansas State #70 Oklahoma State #70

Baylor #77

Texas Tech #90 West Virigina #90

TCU #92

So how is it that KU is slipping? If I remember correctly, last year KU was ranked in the 60s or 70s. Care to expand on your point?

Sam Constance 8 years, 5 months ago

Whoops, those were public institution rankings. Well, all of them except Baylor's and TCU's rankings, which I pulled from their U.S. News profile pages.

Here are the overall rankings:

Texas #46

Iowa State #101 Oklahoma #101

TCU #92

Baylor #77

Kansas #106

Kansas State #139 Oklahoma State #139

Texas Tech #165 West Virginia #165

The point still applies--KU's ranking is not slipping. And we are no worse off compared to our fellow conference schools than we were in the old Big 12, since A&M, Missouri, Nebraska and Colorado all ranked ahead of KU.

Steve Hillyer 8 years, 5 months ago

KU was 46th among public universities last year and 101st overall so KU has indeed dropped in the rankings from last year. KU at one point in the early '90s was ranked 30th among public schools so this year's decline just continues what has been going on for the last 15 years or so. When US News first started publishing these rankings KU was well ahead of Neb and Oklahoma and just above MU, now we are looking up at all of them, embarrassing.

Sam Constance 8 years, 5 months ago

I did know that we were MUCH higher in the 1990s. I didn't know last year's numbers for sure, so thanks.

Now whether or not 5 slots in one year means much is up for debate, but the fact that it's the same direction as the 15-year downward trend isn't a good sign.

I still think KU's position in conference realignment is secure as long as they remain in rare, elite company in college basketball. Not many schools have basketball programs that bring enough national cache to make them valuable in terms of conference realignment, but KU is one of those schools. Plus, I don't think the Big 12 is going anywhere in the realistically foreseeable future.

bjejayhawk69 8 years, 5 months ago

Grab an appropriate school when it comes along. I think Louisville is better than people realize in all sports. Would give presence in the Kentucky, southern Ohio area. Bringing on new schools needs to include increasing TV viewers. If you can convince a BYU that would be good.

LAJayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

"...but also should be able to continue healthy rivalries with schools such as Navy, USC, Michigan State and others."

According to the Chicago Trib, the Irish will keep their rivalry games against Navy, USC and Stanford, and will likely play those old Big 10 rivalries on a rotating basis. It'll be a little weird not seeing ND play Michigan and Michigan St every year... but I suppose no less weird than KU not playing mizzou or Texas and A&M not playing each other. So is the way of the conference realignment world.,0,4749218.story

As to ND to the Big 12 talks, it's pretty clear all of that was simply a means of leverage for the Irish, as the ACC didn't want ND joining without football. They showed the ACC they had other options, and the ACC caves with the understanding that ND will play 5 games against ACC opponents. Big 12 was never going to pick up Notre Dame, and those thinking we would actually add FSU or Clemson should probably come down out of the clouds as well. That was a super-long shot that never really had a chance, even though it would have been sweet had it happened.

David Gisi 8 years, 5 months ago

Maybe I am just a dreamer, but I still believe that if a clear cut offer had been laid out for FSU, Clemson and ND, inviting all 3 together, there was better than 50/50 chance of it happening. Even better if another school to the northeast came along ie Rutgers or BC.

Vernon Riggs 8 years, 5 months ago

No team playing in the ACC will ever play for the NCAA National Championship in the 4-Team Playoff that starts in 2014. Will FSU and Clemson trade that cold hard fact for a Junior Membership from Notre Dame?

What does Notre Dame get for their Junior Membership? Share of the ACC's TV deal? Part of the ACC's Bowl Money shares? Position in line for one of the ACC bowl spots? Seems like a lot for five games per year.

Brian Skelly 8 years, 5 months ago

While this is certainly news worthy, does anyone really view this as some sorta seismic shift that drastically alters the College Football landscape more than it already has the last 2-3 years? I dont think it does. They're going from a crumbling Big East where they were a ZERO partner for football to an ACC partner where they'll actually play some ACC schools. Im a little surprised its FIVE per year, but lets be honest... other than two or three schools, most of the ACC is fodder... of which it still wouldnt be that shocking if Notre Dame has trouble with. It might improve NDs odds of getting into a 'Final Four', but my guess is it is only marginally.

I have to agree with Matt nearly 100% on his assessment. Did anyone ever HONESTLY think Notre Dame was coming to the Big 12??? Now, I WANTED it to happen, but I never really believed or bought into that idea.

I also think that this going to keep the Big 12 at 10 for a hell of a long time as well. Is that what I want? No. Would I have loved to see a mass-exodus of the good ACC football teams coming our way? Yes. But again, pie in the sky sorta stuff. The one thing all of these 'realignments' shows is that it doesnt take much than an uncredible "unamed source" to blow #$@% out our $%@% and people freak out about it.

Personally Id still like to add Louisville, but finding another dance partner to join -- I mean who would we even go after really -- it just doesnt seem to make much sense.

One thing overlooked in all this is that I think ND liked being "East Coast Centric" the whole time. Your not gonna a get a lotta "Subway Alumni" going to the heart of Texas now are you? Id imagine UConn or Rutgers (or even Louisville) will end up being the 16th team. And the ACC will continue its fine tradition of mediocre football.

canusayduh 8 years, 5 months ago poor poor people who were banking on Notre Dame coming to the Big 12 when the good teams are leaving in a mass exodus. Have you finally figured it out yet?

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

You mean the elite Nebraska, Colorado, Missouri, and Texas A&M teams?

Yeah, good thing all the "good" teams left. I would hate to have to absord their massively impressive 2-5 aggregate record so far.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago


Can you address the reported statement that "Notre Dame has acces to the ACC's Orange Bowl," that was posted on ESPN.

If Notre Dame can sneak in and take your automatic bid to the Orange Bowl, I can see why they went ACC over the Big 12. Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia... Ehh, any sane football team would say "No way," to such a demand. I cannot imagine that it would sit al that well with the traditionals already in the ACC.

Yeah, North Carolina and Duke might not give a crap, but you can bet FSU or VT would. So what is the official deal concerning their bowls?

Thanks in advance.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

Also, I would like to see a similar football arrangement done with BYU. Note, I do not mean adding them for other sports, I mean playing five games against them annually.

If you are looking for an independent to buffer up your non-conference schedule with both fan interest and dollars, I would think BYU would be a solid fit.

I feel like it would be a win-win for both sides. Their home games could be televised on the BYU network, and the road games added in with B12 revenue.

Throw in television exposure for everybody else.

Who is with me?

Ron Prichard 8 years, 5 months ago

Sounds like a good plan to me. BYU keeps their independent status, the Big 12 stays at 10 teams, and both get added exposure and revenue.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

Where is the special arrangement? And your assertion that Mormonism is a cult and a reason we shouldn't schedule them in football is pretty ridiculous. I won't flag your comment, but it won't shock me if somebody does.

utahjayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

You can have your opinion. It's just that it doesn't belong in this discussion period.

Jason Renfrow 8 years, 5 months ago's no more of a cult than by your logic.....we should never schedule Notre Dame either.

Stephan123 8 years, 5 months ago

Notre Dame has a much better shot competing in a weak ACC. As for the academic question, KU should see a rise in its standing as the university's new admission standards are implemented over the next few years. The admission standard is one of the factors computed to figure out "rank". ACC was quite nervous about holding on to its members. $50 million is a whole lot of cash.

Daniel Kennamore 8 years, 5 months ago

This is yet another example of the Big 12 getting hosed because Texas made us drag our feet. Clemson and Florida State were both right there ready to jump ship but we dragged on because of the pretty public courting by Texas to get Notre Dame. Now we've lost all three.

And Matt, a lot of us are not after 12 teams because bigger = better; we are after that because it's more STABLE. I don't care if we make 3 to 5 million less a year because we add 'inferior' schools like Louisville and's more STABLE. The only reason we don't grab a very lucrative Louisville program before the ACC at this point is Texas greed, plain and simple.

Sam Constance 8 years, 5 months ago

1) What are you talking about with the dragging of feet? Why do people insist on talking about the conference realignment goings on as if they have a freaking clue of what was going on behind closed doors?

2) How, exactly, is 12 teams "more stable" than 10?

Jason Renfrow 8 years, 5 months ago

Did you know what site you were on when you typed this insane rambling. It's "KU"Sports.....maybe you have a low IQ....and if that's the case I apologize....but I recall "KU" playing all the way until April last year....Yeah that's right....It's called the Final Four....but since Clemson has NEVER played in a Final Four maybe you didn't know.

championhawks 8 years, 5 months ago

Maybe this will answer your question:

Since it doesn't seem that you are very bright by the way you wrote your post, I will summarize.

Big 12 teams listed: 2 (Texas is first w/ $71 million profit in football and OU with $36 million profit in football.)

ACC teams listed (minus ND since they aren't a member in football): 0

And did you really try to mock us with a basketball reference?

utahjayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

I love Clemson, a perennial underachiever if there ever was one. On the field, always hyped to the hilt in September and consistently fades until they secure a 2nd tier bowl every year. In terms of hoops, they're a doormat and really have no business competing in the ACC.

Yea, I can see why you'd go on our website and run your mouth.

Ron Prichard 8 years, 5 months ago

I wanted ND but only if we could have had all the sports ultimately. Without football, I don't think it is a huge loss. From some of the details I have heard, ND may be getting some things from the ACC that the Big 12 was never willing to offer. Also, I was hearing that ND's TV ratings with NBC have had some of their all-time lowest ratings in the last year and a half. ND's prestige is falling but they still wanted several special concessions from everyone else. If they wanted to be treated differently, then we didn't want them in the Big 12. Remember, that's what started all this mess in the first place. Nebraska and MU were upset that Texas got a bigger piece of the pie than they did.

The most disappointing part of all of this for me is that it would appear FSU and Clemson are now squarely out of the picture, along with any other ACC school. So, while I do like the 10 team Big 12, if they wanted to expand at anytime in the near or near-distant future, they needed to strike while the ACC was weakened. I wouldn't want to add teams just to add right now. I kind of think the SEC is already regretting their decision to add to mediocre teams that didn't add significant TV value (teams to remain unnamed--ha!).

The Big 12 is secure for several years to come, and after this move I wouldn't expect much change for a while. The Big East may scramble and try to add some more middling teams, but the major power conferences are pretty well set for a while. The only other thing I could see is whenever (or if) ND decides to join the ACC in football is the ACC trying to add one more team to make it an even 16 (Louisville or UConn?).

jgkojak 8 years, 5 months ago

Well, I can see the B12 lasting with 10 teams for 13 years (per TV agreement) - then, at the end of year 13-- boom - TX and OK start evaluating their options.

A few things to consider: 1) Will Penn State be in the Big 10 in a decade? There are still some ugly things about boosters and Sandusky that will come out.

2) If Penn State is pushed out of the Big 10, what the replacement school? Rutgers would be 1st choice-- but they may in the ACC then The only other geographically viable AAU school is Kansas.

I contend that either as a replacement for Penn St or in an expansion to 14-16 teams, the Big 10 issues as invite to KU about 12 years from now.

Displayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

Is it any wonder that the Big 12 is stronger now that Brady Deaton is no longer the Chairman of the Big 12 supervisory committee??? He wasn't interested at all about keeping the Big 12 strong, or growing the conference. His only motive was to get Miztake into another conference! That's why I hope every team that plays Methzzoo pounds them into little pieces.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

Look, I have not been much of a UT fan, but this time I am going to come to their defense.

Let me ask you folks this: Is it plausible that a school like Notre Dame might be asking for way too much for a conference to take their offer? I am going to say "yes" to that one.

Is it plausible that the ACC gave up more than the Big 12 would have simply because they were the next weakest conference after the Big East? I am going to say "yes" to that as well.

If you scroll down to the 11th paragraph of the ESPN article it makes mention of some bowl tie-ins, to include the Orange Bowl. Nothing else is mentioned on how that works.

My guess is that Notre Dame leveraged a desperate conference to give up something that the Big 12 would not. And to be honest, if it involves benefits like bowl placement over a full-on conference member than I am NOT for that deal.

I think as the days go on and the details come out, this marriage between the ACC and Notre Dame will look less glorious.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

Also, concerning the exit fee increase, note this article:

If Florida State was debating a move, I would think it would be now or never. If the $50 million is to come into effect, FSU (and other schools) would have a legal recourse to exit the league before it is legally binding.

If I am a member of a rotary club, and one day ten other members vote to charge $50 bucks for me to join a different rotary club, it does not mean I am instantly bound by that fee.

And the ACC commish is a dirty SOB, as a side note. If you feel a sting in your a$$ region, you need to locate him as soon as possible, and make sure his pants are not at his knees.

blindrabbit 8 years, 5 months ago

Since all these blogs are getting way too serious, here is a bit of trivia. Kansas is bordered by four states all which have 8 letters their in their name. RockChalk!

riverdrifter 8 years, 5 months ago

ND doesn't have near the clout they had 10 years ago. It would be fun to have them in football but it's no biggie.

Curtis Stutz 8 years, 5 months ago

Forget about adding teams, I think the full round robin format is great. Other conference regular season titles are becoming totally meaningless at this point. If FSU is upset about the $50 million they'll call. If not there's just not enough reason to add teams like UofL and Cinci. UofL should probably just give up and see if the ACC will add them in bball to balance out ND. BigEast is dying fast with Calhoun out and ND out. Going to be strictly 2nd tier at this point.

Krohnutz, no doubt the ACC gave up some things the Big12 wouldn't have to ND, but they also didn't have as much to give up. Don't think ND will have an opportunity to steal an Orange Bowl bid, but a Chick-Fil-A bid or Russell Athletic bid yes. Not like with the Big12 where the deal has been made for next best teams to play in a big bowl similar to the Cotton Bowl setup they have now. ACC probably did enough to appease FSU with the ND move, now they'll have them both locked in with the big buyout.

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

I just watched Musberger on PTI and he also mentioned Notre Dame having access to ACC bowls, including the Orange Bowl, yet nobody elaborates on the details of that arrangement. If they wanted the same from the Big 12 I would say it was a no-brainer to say "hell no." I find it odd that nobody publishes the actual details of the agreement.

Vernon Riggs 8 years, 5 months ago

Exit fees are like used car prices..they look nice on the windshield, but nobody pays full price. If FSU want to leave the ACC, they wouldn't pay $50 million. Did MethZoo pay full price? Did the Aggies?

If nobody joins the Big12, that's okay too. Better schedule. More $$$ divided by only 10 teams. A better path to the 4-Team Play-off Championships.

All the people that are saying in 13 years, Texas and OU will be leaving the Big12...13 years is a lifetime! The sky isn't falling yet.

DanHogan95 8 years, 5 months ago

Matt, I've read a few places that Louisville is good enough to be accepted as #11 but there isn't a #12 out there to make the deal possible. Do you buy in to that?

Spencer Goff 8 years, 5 months ago

I am not sure Matt is still perusing this thread. I have not heard any of this but the assertion makes sense. Until you get extremely east, what valuable commodities are there that are not locked into another power conference? Not many. Man, Louisville fans have to be frustrated.

utahjayhawk 8 years, 5 months ago

Louisville is consistently strong in the top two sports. They're completely owning UNC right now. They'd be a good addition.

jaybate 8 years, 5 months ago

This story means ND expects Obama will win, and so it will be another four years before the Big 12 oil and gas interests have a shot at combining conference expansion with regional political economic interests.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.