Advertisement

Advertisement

A look at where KU's offense is better — and worse — than a year ago

Kansas guard Elijah Johnson takes off up the court past Baylor guard Brady Heslip after a steal during the first half on Monday, Jan. 14, 2013 at Allen Fieldhouse.

Kansas guard Elijah Johnson takes off up the court past Baylor guard Brady Heslip after a steal during the first half on Monday, Jan. 14, 2013 at Allen Fieldhouse. by Nick Krug

The Kansas men's basketball team ranks 17th in Ken Pomeroy's adjusted offensive efficiency — a measure that takes into account a team's points per possession while adjusting for schedule strength. A year ago, the Jayhawks finished 19th nationally in the stat.

So the Jayhawks are following the same offensive formula for success, right?

Actually, what's interesting is that this year's team varies greatly from last year's in the way it produces offense.

Let's take a look. The following chart takes a look at 10 advanced statistical measures: adjusted offensive efficiency, effective field-goal percentage (shooting), turnover percentage, offensive rebound percentage, free throw rate (the frequency a team gets to the free throw line), two-point percentage, three-point percentage, free throw percentage, three-point attempt percentage (the percentage of field goals shot that are three-pointers) and assist percentage.

The red line is the 2011-12 season (final stats), while the blue is 2012-13. The higher up the dot, the better the team's national rank in that category.

All statsitics from KenPom.com.

KU's offense: 2012-13 vs. 2011-12

KU's offense: 2012-13 vs. 2011-12 by Jesse Newell

Enlarge graph

Let's start with the positives for KU: The Jayhawks are a much better shooting team this year, which makes some sense considering they are more balanced offensively compared to a year ago.

What is surprising — especially after I watched passes sail into the stands more than once while covering the team during its August exhibition trip in Europe — is how well the Jayhawks have taken care of the ball. KU has only turned it over on 18.8 percent of its possessions so far, and if that number holds up, it would tie the best mark for a Bill Self team at KU (2007-08 also turned it over on 18.8 percent of its possessions).

Though the Jayhawks' shooting is better — especially on three-pointers and free throws — that hasn't made as much impact as it could because of the team's struggles with offensive rebounds and getting to the free throw line.

KU has grabbed just 32.5 percent of its missed shots this year. If that number stands, it'll be the lowest percentage by a Self team at KU (last year's team was second-lowest at 34.6 percent).

The Jayhawks' free throw rate (37.0) also is on pace to be the lowest in the last five seasons.

Two numbers that remain mostly unchanged from a year ago are three-point attempt percentage and assist percentage. KU once again does not rely a lot on three-point shots, and that's a good strategy to have as an elite team in the NCAA Tournament, as two-point shooting is much more consistent game to game compared to three-point shooting.

Meanwhile, the Jayhawks continue to be a team that shares the ball well, though part of that high assist percentage this year might speak to the fact that the Jayhawks don't have many players that can create for themselves off the dribble.

In the end, KU is having similar offensive success this season compared to last while producing those points in an entirely different fashion.

Though this team doesn't get offensive rebounds or to the free throw line like a typical Self team, it has made up for it by shooting a high percentage while taking care of the basketball better than any Jayhawks team in the past decade.

;

Comments

Eliott Reeder 1 year, 3 months ago

Also, do these numbers take into consideration the fact that with a higher FG% there are inherently fewer opportunities for offensive boards? That correlation seems important. I wish Withey would rebound better as well. I agree with all of the above posts. Some players just have a certain knack for the way a ball will carom off the rim, just as Jeff has a certain knack for getting his hand on a ball that is being shot. KY has that rebounding knack, but lacks the height and muscle that someone like T-Rob had. If he had that kind of power and height in addition to his nose for the ball, he would be amazing on the boards. There are, however, quite a few times that Withey (and others) seem like they are just standing there watching the ball, waiting for it to come to them. They don't always box out, and occasionally they actually watch the ball bounce on the ground off the rim before anybody bothers to go after it. That drives me nuts. T-Rob used to rip the ball out of his own teammate's hands... I want to see more of that!

0

William Blake 1 year, 3 months ago

Rebounding is an issue this year, and rebounding should start at the 5. Jeff needs to lift his numbers before draft day. He's not the same player that arrived in Lawrence a few years back and a big part of that change is his increase in strength (thanks to Hudy). Jeff does have the strength to pull in more rebs than he's doing now.

I'm not so sure it's a good thing for Jeff to be almost a "foul-less" center. I'd like to see him spend a few more fouls in order to nab more rebs. It's all about putting a fire under his shady spot and that's something CS and staff need to work on between now and March. It's for his own good, so push him harder because he's leaving some of his potential stats on other team's stat sheets.

Our entire team needs lessons on how, where and when to box out. They've come too accustom to thinking the ball will drop in the bucket every time it's shot from a Jayhawk because they all seem to like to spectate each others' shots, instead of rip limbs off opposing teams fighting for position.

These guys need to anticipate shot releases a bit quicker and be trained with the knowledge of where most rebounds go from different angles on the floor, and then execute the best position they can in the split second of time they have to establish rebounding position. Rebound position should also be considered when designing set plays.

We need to raise our reb #s by March because it is a great way to help us win games where the ball isn't dropping on the first shot. Putbacks also help lift team spirits and turn scoring droughts into scoring floods!

0

shottybotch 1 year, 3 months ago

Great stuff per usual Jesse. Is there any way to see this compared against previous seasons? The 07-08 team would be the one I'm most curious about.

0

PSM 1 year, 3 months ago

Three pointers are the great equalizer in the NCAA tournament.

1

Daniel Kennamore 1 year, 3 months ago

I'm confused; is this looking at their stats compared to this time of the season last year...or their final numbers?

If you're saying their mid-Jan. numbers are already on par with the entire season last year...that's a VERY good sign.

0

Mike Barnhart 1 year, 3 months ago

Your numbers support my "eye test." This team denies shots on defense and makes shots on offense. Last years team tried to wreak havoc. They wanted to turn you over, get out on the break and dunk. It seems we don't get as many transition baskets but we take more jumpers.

The genius of Bill Self, he coaches to his teams strengths!

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.