BDub

Comment history

The $6,400 question: Should KU Athletics be reimbursed?

Reword that: Marchiony seems to be genetically coded to make the school look bad.

May 7, 2008 at 3:24 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

The $6,400 question: Should KU Athletics be reimbursed?

Marchiony is a tool. That really says it all.

May 7, 2008 at 9:01 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

'Minnesota grunt' identifies wild Aldrich

Even the greatest players need time to develop and learn the college game. He will be contributing more and more as the season wears on. By March, he'll be in the thick of it.

December 12, 2007 at 8:55 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Mayer: Jayhawks have 'big' problem

More nattering naybobs of negativity from the old and crotchety end of the JW staff. I'm sorry, but this negative stuff is all that Mayer seems capable of providing. Much of it is baseless, and all of it is unnecessary.

December 7, 2007 at 10:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

KU player submits diversion application

LESS than $1000. Could have been a pack of gum. Either way - stupid thing to do. Let's just hope the lesson gets learned.

November 29, 2007 at 9:33 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Plunge into history

Awesome article, Ryan. Great to have some perspective going into this rivalry game. We've come a long way, baby! Go Hawks!

October 3, 2007 at 10:22 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Mayer: Gridiron success crucial

Is the fact that Bill Mayer is bitter, crotchety and entirely negative some kind of newsflash? That's just old hat around here. The tenor of his writing borders on the pathetic. It's easy enough to make one's point without all that bitterness, and especially without encouraging others to "harpoon" a kid who is just trying to figure out the best way to go in his career. Mayer - you're one of THOSE fans that everyone else hates. Retire already.

May 4, 2007 at 8:54 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Talib suspended; Allen sidelined with knee injury

Chill, people. This isn't exactly the end of the world - we should still be able to win the first two games.

August 28, 2006 at 12:19 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Woodling: Hearing a time to grovel

No actorman, I wasn't being negative. I said he was the "perfect guy" and told him to enjoy himself. What's negative about that? : )

Yes, it is hard to write a positive article about something like this - my comment was more about Chuck's work as a whole and how his entire tack on everything is so negative. That's what makes him the perfect guy for this article. Besides, what does this article tell us that hasn't already been told? Nothing - it's just piling on. Typical Nega-Chuck-ery.

August 16, 2006 at 8:13 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Woodling: Hearing a time to grovel

Negative, negative, negative. That's all Woodling's got in him. He's the perfect guy for an article like this. Enjoy your nattering nabobs, Chuck.

August 15, 2006 at 10:41 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BDub