Do you think the Big 12 should try to expand this offseason?

No, the Big 12 is fine with 10 teams and is stable for the long term. 16% 157 votes

Yes, the Big 12 should be proactive instead of reactive when it comes to realignment. 79% 743 votes

Undecided 3% 32 votes

932 total votes


justinryman 1 year, 4 months ago

I think they should add more teams, 2 or 4.

And here is why. There is no reason to run to another conference and be their last pick. Remember the kid who was picked last at recess? Go get the top teams you can get and then you as well are not getting the last pick and getting stuck with some onther version of Kstate.

Go get FSU and VT. While at it go after Virginia and Clemson too. It would fill up the Eastern side of the map and cut down on some of the travel within the conference as well.

The Grant of Rights is holding the conf. together for the time being, but once it gets to full strenght there wouldbe no reason for teams to leave again. The Big10 is looking to add more TVs to the East, not the midwest and south. The SEC why do they need toadd anyone? And the PAC12 isn't going midwest or Texas either. They are going to keep it all in the Mountain and Pacific time zones.

Act don't react.


Jeffery Barrett 1 year, 4 months ago

Well, it's obvious Bill Mcneil doesn't know what he's yapping about.


THE_REAL_DEAL_WITH_BILL_MCNEIL 1 year, 4 months ago

No, the Big 12 is dead. Adding teams now only makes it harder for KU to get out before the grant of rights expires.


John Fitzgerald 1 year, 4 months ago

I think we need to at least get back to 12 teams again. If not change the conference name to the Magnificent 10. Whats the point being called the big 12 if we don't have 12 teams? What does the number 12 stand for at that point? Nothing. So, get 12 teams or change the name of the conference.


Commenting has been disabled for this item.