Monday, October 11, 2021

Stay the course’: Leipold and coordinators trusting rebuilding philosophies amid KU football losing streak

Kansas head coach Lance Leipold and the Jayhawks take the field for kickoff against South Dakota on Friday, Sept. 3, 2021 at Memorial Stadium. (Photo by Nick Krug/Special to the Journal-World)

Kansas head coach Lance Leipold and the Jayhawks take the field for kickoff against South Dakota on Friday, Sept. 3, 2021 at Memorial Stadium. (Photo by Nick Krug/Special to the Journal-World)


The Kansas football team’s current four-game losing streak isn’t the first such skid head coach Lance Leipold has encountered while trying to rebuild an FBS program. And some of the philosophies Leipold and his longtime coordinators leaned on at Buffalo a few years ago, they expect, will work for the Jayhawks, too.

Looking back at what he learned while rebooting the UB program, Leipold used three words to sum up the approach his staff used previously with the Bulls and is now implementing with the Jayhawks: “Stay the course.”

Leipold and his righthand men, defensive coordinator Brian Borland and offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki, had to follow that directive early on during their time at UB, which included two four-game losing streaks in 2016, Leipold’s second year in charge with the Bulls.

Displeasure can exist, Leipold acknowledged, during the most difficult stretches of a losing season.

“I know our locker room, our players, our coaches, our fan base, it’s disappointing,” KU’s head coach said of the Jayhawks’ recent woes. “It can be frustrating. We didn’t come here to let anyone down.”

Believing in the plan, Leipold added, is a crucial component of making it through to a more successful future.

“Just like we tell our players: trust the process,” he said. “You hear that a lot in football today. You go back to your values and what you’re going to be, because if you start panicking — you can’t coach angry.”

Another important piece of weathering the tough times, Leipold added, is making sure no one in the program ever normalizes or accepts losing. That’s a subject he said coaches have brought up in recent weeks and is important to remember.

“You never want to get used to accepting defeat,” Leipold said. “It does kind of eat at you. From a head coach’s perspective, you’ve got to own what’s out there and work to get it better.”


Kansas defensive coordinator Brian Borland takes the field with his players for practice on Saturday, Aug. 14, 2021 at Memorial Stadium.

As the Jayhawks (1-4 overall, 0-2 Big 12) come off their bye week and prepare to face Texas Tech (4-2, 1-2) on Saturday for homecoming (3 p.m., ESPN+), Borland said he finds himself revisiting some of the lessons he picked up during the rebuild at Buffalo.

“One of them is just to try to have some patience and recognize that it is a work in progress and it’s not something that’s going to get solved tomorrow necessarily,” said Borland, who has been Leipold’s defensive coordinator since the two began working together at Wisconsin-Whitewater in 2007. “I’m not discouraged with our players at all. I’m discouraged with the results.”

KU’s defense has struggled throughout the team’s losing streak in recent weeks. But Borland said he sees his players remaining determined to “show up and work hard,” and called them “coachable.”

Borland said he hasn’t seen them give up nor fall into a rut where they’re down on themselves.

“They’re still striving to improve and they want to. That’s all we can really ask,” Borland said. “You’ve just got to trust the process that if we’re consistent over time with the message and how we do things, then eventually the corner’s going to get turned. We’re just in the middle of it right now. You’ve got to see it as a process.”

That’s a notion that carries over to what all of the coaches are trying to achieve at KU. Kotelnicki, who has worked as Leipold’s O.C. since 2013, said he reminds the players of that, as well.


Kansas offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki talks with another member of the coaching staff during practice on Saturday, Aug. 14, 2021 at Memorial Stadium.

“You could win by 100, you could lose by 100. What you do on Sunday and Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday doesn’t change,” Kotelnicki said he tells the Jayhawks’ offensive players every week. “The process, you can’t negotiate it, you can’t change it.”

The only thing that’s different when a team is winning, Kotelnicki said, is that coaches and players tend to smile a bit more. He said the Jayhawks would be doing the same things each week regardless of the outcome of the most recent game.

The big picture approach never got modified when they were at Buffalo, Kotelnicki said, and “daily improvement” always was one of the primary goals through the good times and bad.

“You’ve got to be disciplined and you’ve got to probably grit your teeth a little bit more when you’ve had a loss or two,” the O.C. said. “But what you do doesn’t change.”

Prior to this season, Leipold, Borland and Kotelnicki last went through a four-game losing streak in 2017, which was their third year at UB. Buffalo concluded that season on a three-game winning streak. The Bulls then went 10-4 in 2018, 8-5 in 2019 and 6-1 in 2020. UB never lost more than two games in a row during the staff’s final three seasons in the MAC.

Still not even six months into his massive reclamation project at KU, Leipold, while on the topic of directing a team through a losing streak, referenced the abbreviated offseason he and his staff took on when he decided to leave Buffalo to coach the Jayhawks.

Most of the time in college football, coaching changes happen in December or January, giving a new head coach and his staff roughly eight to nine months together, depending on the circumstances, before the first game comes around. KU, following the ousters of former head coach Les Miles and former Athletic Director Jeff Long, didn’t hire Leipold until the last day of April, on the eve of the Jayhawks’ spring game — the finale of the 15-practice spring slate.

In May, some new head football coaches have been with a program for five months. Leipold said he didn’t even meet with a player on the KU roster until May 3 of this year. Five months later, the Jayhawks were already five games into their 2021 season.

“That’s not an excuse,” Leipold said of the timeline. “It’s just a fact for all of us. I have to keep that in perspective, too.”

Now 147-43 as a head football coach, Leipold said he’s still new enough to the KU job that sometimes he will look at a certain player on the roster and, because he wasn’t around when the vast majority of the players first stepped foot on campus, forget that Player A hasn’t been with the program as long as Player B.

“I can’t look at Steven McBride and look at Kwamie Lassiter and think they’ve been here through the same stuff,” Leipold said, using sophomore McBride and super-senior Lassiter as an example. “Sometimes when you take over a team you kind of look at everybody being here longer than they really have.”

Occasionally, KU’s head coach said, he has to stop himself and make a mental note of where a player should be, development wise. Once the coach recalibrates, Leipold said his mind usually goes back to the longterm approach he and the rest of KU’s coaches are taking.

“We just have to keep pounding away at this thing,” he said.


Dirk Medema 2 weeks, 1 day ago

Believing in the plan is a crucial component of making it through to a more successful future. Trust the process.

Doug Cramer 2 weeks ago

2022 KU Recruiting Class is Ranked 98th by Rivals.

We are tied with James Madison and Campbell University

This is a red flag to me.

We got to get some talent in the trenches, otherwise this rebuild will never happen.

Glen Miller 2 weeks ago

And the last few years we've had a top 50 recruiting class at this point in the season and produced the same results. I would like to believe that these coaches are really doing their homework and trying to get the RIGHT guys in here instead of the highest ranked ones. Those class rankings don't mean diddly to a team in our spot, trying to gain footing. If this is still happening a few years from now with the same coaching staff in place, then let's worry a bit.

Joseph Bullock 2 weeks ago

Doug Cramer, We need to look at all the facts! First of all, they had a really late start on Recruiting, because of when the staff was hired! We also need to look at how young the team is, so maybe we didn’t need as many players as other teams. And I don’t think we have all of our normal Scholarships available yet.

Dirk Medema 2 weeks ago

There are facts, and then there is analysis of facts. It also helps to have comprehensive facts when analyzing data.

Rivals does have us tied for 98th. We currently have 6 recruits committed. 6 recruits is tied with Louisville for the smallest class size. Rivals’ rankings are based on total class points so very class size driven ranking. KUs recruiting class has an average of 2.83 stars. If the rankings are sorted by quality of recruits (stars) vs quantity of recruits (total points), then we are ranked 63rd. As Joseph points out, these coaches got a really late start on everything and the class size was small even when they started (previous coaches). Some have even commented in the past that the first recruiting class shouldn’t be included in consideration of a coach because of the lack of time to establish relationships. Probably a little different in this case.

All said, I’d say yellow flag vs red. We do definitely need help in the trenches, though mostly because those areas have been under recruited in the past and they are vital.

Brett McCabe 2 weeks ago

Ummm, it’s two months to signing date.

We are behind on all fronts because the staff was hired late. Not exactly a news flash. Some people just don’t know how to grind. I think that Doug is one of those people.

The other factor, more than ever before, is consideration of portal opportunities. This will play into “recruiting” far more than in the past. If you are unsure of the impact, look up the current KU bball roster. This staff will likely need to build an unconventional recruiting class in year one, though I believe they will be heavily focused on players with at least three years of eligibility. They won’t panic, but I expect them to be smart in balancing out their efforts between high school kids and other players.

Layne Pierce 2 weeks ago

We simply have to have a better offensive line, and defensive line, we have adequate players elsewhere, but without linemen who can at least be mediocre it is impossible to compete at this level.

It will be interewting to see the growth in the lineman that we have on the roster. Very few of our linemen over the last 10 years have actually improved over time.

Stick with the plan, but please try to run clock and hold down ridiculous scores. Competitiveness is a perception as well as a reality.


Sign in to comment