Tuesday, June 24, 2014


Column: NBA mock drafts a mockery; Embiid still No. 1

NBA Commissioner David Stern takes the stage at the beginning of the NBA basketball draft, Thursday, June 27, 2013, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)

NBA Commissioner David Stern takes the stage at the beginning of the NBA basketball draft, Thursday, June 27, 2013, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)


Trace the origin of most mock drafts to lies and misdirection plays. NBA general managers and their underlings for clubs holding lottery picks do their best to float the word, almost always off-the-record, as to their draft-day intentions. They do so to try to influence their competitors away from smart picks and toward safe ones.

So instead of looking at mock drafts to try to figure out what your favorite lottery team will do Thursday night, just ask yourself what you would do by ranking 1 through 14 the prospects available for this draft. In so doing, you’ll probably get closer to draft results than the mocks constructed by those who have NBA sources.

Here’s how I would rank them:

1. Joel Embiid (Kansas center): He is quicker than Jabari Parker and has more impressive offensive skills than Andrew Wiggins and, oh, by the way, he’s 7 feet tall and a relative newcomer to the game. Even after a stress fracture of the back and a stress fracture of the foot that required surgery, it’s odd that talk centers on The Big Three. It all should center on The Big One.

In any business, those who base decisions on what move will be least likely in resulting in a pink slip end up getting fired in the end. Only cowards would pass on Embiid.

Nothing to discuss here. Embiid is in a class by himself. His tumbling in many mock drafts has a manufactured feel to it, as if maybe teams are floating that to try to get other teams to back off of him so that he falls into their laps.

2. Jabari Parker (Duke small forward): He scores from inside and on the perimeter and has enough size and skill to project as an NBA All-Star. He won’t make any all-defensive teams, but his passion for the game already has led to offensive creativity that will come in handy when defended by better athletes.

3. Andrew Wiggins (Kansas small forward): The best athlete in the draft, Wiggins might develop into a good shooter and might improve his ball-handling significantly, which is another way of saying he might not. His go-to move — drive from the wing into the lane, lose the ball and wait for the whistle — won’t work in the NBA.

4. Dante Exum (Australian point guard): Son of Michael Jordan’s former North Carolina teammate, Cecil Exum. From everything I’ve heard about Australia, the people are a blast and don’t tie their self-esteem to getting to know superstar high school basketball players, so my guess is Exum isn’t as vulnerable to conceit as many American prospects and therefore probably remained humble and worked hard on his game.

5. Julius Randle (Kentucky power forward): So much is made of his weaknesses — all left-handed, limited shooting range, trouble scoring in the post against taller defenders, etc. — some forget he’s super strong, embraces contact, has a great motor, loves to rebound and is smart enough to work around his weaknesses and accentuate his many strengths.

6. Aaron Gordon (Arizona power forward): Strong, explosive, quick, hustles. If only he could make a free throw.

7. Noah Vonleh (Indiana power forward): Played some on the wing in high school before growing and looked comfortable playing inside in his lone season at Indiana. Jumped too soon to the pros, which could permanently damage his confidence. Still worth taking a shot on this early because he fits the prototype of an NBA power forward.

8. Nik Stauskas (Michigan shooting guard): There is always room for a killer shooter who knows how to score in other ways.

9. Doug McDermott (Creighton small forward): Moves great without the ball and has extended his shooting range every year of his life. By the time he’s 50, he’ll be making shots from the parking lot.

10. James Young (Kentucky shooting guard): Hungry scorer not afraid to take the big shot and although just 6-foot-6, has a 7-foot wingspan. Works hard at getting open and loves to let it fly with a quick release. You won’t find him this high on any mock drafts, which might mean several general managers believe themselves to be the one and only talent evaluator to see him as a major sleeper, so they’re keeping their mouths shut.

11. Nick Johnson (Arizona combo guard): You won’t find him in the first round of most mock drafts, but put those in a time capsule, open it in 15 years and what you’ll find is that he should have been a lottery pick. Nephew of late great Dennis Johnson, Nick brings similar leaping ability. He doesn’t easily fit into either point guard or shooting guard prototype. So what? He’s a terrific guard and whoever takes him will be bragging about the steal of the 2014 draft.

12. Adreian Payne (Michigan State power forward): He bangs hard and shoots soft, a nice combination of qualities.

13. Gary Harris (Michigan State shooting guard): Some ultra-aggressive guys won’t be denied as scorers and he’s one of them.

14. Kyle Anderson (UCLA forward): His hands, which are attached to long arms, are a lot quicker than his feet and he’s one of those radar athletes blessed with a great feel for the game, a la hockey great Wayne Gretzky and NBA legend Larry Bird. Not that he’ll be great like they were, but he’ll be better than his less-than-stellar explosiveness and strength would indicate.


Rodney Crain 5 years ago

TK I would be shocked if someone used the #1 pick on Joel. GM's don't care too much about risks, and some of these teams, by being in this position year after year, do not know what they are doing or even how to run a team, but with so much talent in this draft there are safer players to take. None of these teams want another Oden and Cleveland who was close to the playoffs need to win not wait for a possible difference maker when Parker or Wiggins adds right now to their team. Cleveland if they keep the pick cannot afford another bust pick either. Not with 3 #1 picks in 4 years. A week or so ago I was with you, but this latest injury just is too much risk for a top pick for me. I say he goes 6th or 7th to teams who can wait cause they are so far away from the playoffs. Not #1 now.

Scott Burkhart 5 years ago

C'mon Keegan. Wiggins signature move is not "Drive from the wing into the lane and lose the ball." That's ridiculous. Anyone who watched last year clearly saw him drive from the wing into the lane, perform a pirouette, lose the ball and wait for the whistle.

Cameron Cederlind 5 years ago

These survey questions are getting really difficult:

John Myers 5 years ago

My favorite one that I've seen so far - "Do you own or maintain a small business website?" And the answers were Yes, No or I Don't Know. I want to meet the person that can legitimately answer I Don't Know to that question.

Andy Tweedy 5 years ago

It's gonna be pass/fail soon, denying many of us the opportunity to keep up with our Jayhawks!

Len Shaffer 5 years ago

At first I thought what's the big deal about answering these questions. Now I'm sick of them so if there's an opportunity to write something nonsensical, I'll do it. Otherwise I'll either say I've never heard or something or answer in the most negative way possible -- all while never reading the question. It makes things go a lot faster.

Steve Kubler 5 years ago

I seem to get the one about what tv shows I watch on what provider over and over. Says I get 7 days and then same thing pops up again the next day. I've decided to fill each out differently until they catch on they have a problem... forever in other words.

Jack Wilson 5 years ago

"His tumbling in many mock drafts has a manufactured feel to it, as if maybe teams are floating that to try to get other teams to back off of him so that he falls into their laps."

Hmmm .. actually, the rationalizations as to why teams should ignore an obvious significant injury risk seem more manufactured to me. Unless the picture of Joel Embiid going into surgery was manufactured, and this is a massive conspiracy (meaning the stress fracture in the foot never happened), I'm wondering how it could be manufactured?

It's multiple millions of dollars and perhaps a franchise's future at stake.

It's simply a matter of risk/reward. If you can take a guy like Wiggins or Parker, why risk it on Embiid? Perhaps Exum is the next top point guard. But once you get to #4, then you start comparing him to the competition. Even with the risk, he might be the better choice.

Mark Lindrud 5 years ago

Smart money says a team with more than one pick in the first round picks Embiid. In case he can't play this year you still have another rookie to focus on while Embiid gets healthy. That is why Boston and Orlando seem like good fits. Also, Phoenix has 3 picks and could trade up so that is a potential dark horse. This draft could have a lot of intrigue and I bet there are more trades than normal, which is saying a lot lol.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.