Advertisement

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Keegan

Keegan: Sharp rejoins playmaker ranks

Advertisement

Audio clips

2008 KU-ISU football

Podcast episode

Spodcasters

Spodcasters Postgame: Iowa State

The guys (Tom Keegan and Eric Sorrentino) discuss KU's scare of a victory on Saturday at Iowa State. How big a concern was that first half for the future of KU's season? Who was the MVP of the game after the completely different second half? Other topics include the switch ...

Download podcast

Reader poll

Who was the Jayhawks' MVP in the 35-33 victory over Iowa State?

  • Todd Reesing (18/26, 320 yds, 3 TDs, INT) 21% 441 votes
  • Kerry Meier (125 rec. yds, 2 TDs) 26% 555 votes
  • Jake Sharp (79 yds rushing, 107 yds rec., 2 total TDs) 50% 1055 votes
  • Other 0% 19 votes

2070 total votes.

— Five games into the season, Kansas University's football team pretty much has revealed itself for what it is: slow and not very physical in the trenches, passive in the secondary, extraordinarily gifted, smart and gutsy in the passing game.

Marred by a defense that not only bends but breaks and a flawed offensive line, KU's path to victory involves riding two reliable and remarkable superstars, quarterback Todd Reesing and receiver Kerry Meier working in tandem, and a rotation of mystery playmakers taking turns as the third spark.

One week it might be Dezmon Briscoe. The next it could be Daymond Patterson. Then Johnathan Wilson might take his turn.

On Saturday afternoon at Jack Trice Stadium, where in the second half Reesing was vintage Reesing and Meier was pure Meier, junior running back Jake Sharp returned to prominence for the first time this season and sparked Kansas to a 35-33 comeback victory against Iowa State.

At running back, junior Jocques Crawford hogged the preseason hype, fueling it with a bold stated goal of rushing for 2,000 yards. Angus Quigley became the story, leading the run-challenged Jayhawks in rushing yards in each of the first four games. Sharp hung in the shadows, looking for daylight and instead seeing big bodies. On a team searching for featured running back, he was looking like the third option, a former future star, a flash from Salina who dashed to 63 touchdowns as a high school senior.

At KU, he had a good freshman year and better sophomore season.

As a junior? Entering Saturday's game, Sharp ranked third on the team in rushing with 86 yards, averaging 3.3 per carry. He carried it once in Saturday's first half, KU's most depressing half of football since it trailed 52-0 to Texas in Austin three seasons ago.

It all changed in the third quarter when Reesing faked a handoff to Quigley, Sharped slipped out of the backfield, caught Reesing's pass and burned 67 yards to the end zone. By game's end, Sharp had 186 all-purpose yards (79 rushing, 107 receiving).

"It boosts my confidence," Sharp said of what the game did for him personally. "If there was any little doubt in my mind, if I was like, 'Man, what's going on?' ... Hey, I can do this. My teammates and I, each and every one of us know we can help this team out, but it definitely helps."

Helps the never-ending transition from high school superstar to college contributor.

"We're just 19-, 20-year-old young men. You know college football is not an easy thing," Sharp said. "If everybody could play college football, everybody would. Let me tell you, I think everybody on our team will tell you that college football is as hard if not harder than everybody thought it would be. You've got to be a tough son of a gun to fight through all you have to fight through. Injury things, mental fatigue. We're taking classes, taking 16, 17 hours, we're keeping 3.0s. It's not a job for weak people, to say the least."

Flashing strength and speed, Sharp rejoined the ranks of playmakers.

"I definitely think I'm a guy who can make big plays for our team, and I was called on to do it today," Sharp said. "I think when I'm called on to do it, I'll do it."

More like this

Comments

yates33333 (anonymous) says...

If Keegan is correct let us pray for this season to hurry to an end because it's downhill from now on.

October 5, 2008 at 6:01 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

njjayhawk (anonymous) says...

Yes, Jake did a nice job. But how about an analysis of what has happened to the once - vaunted KU defense? Where is Mortensen? Rivera? Why is the D-line so poor?We readers would appreciate a 'hard look' at the why, after 6 weeks into the season, the defense is near powder puff over much of a game with the likes of ISU, a very average team. Tom, you're on, my man, to provide that analysis.

October 5, 2008 at 7:19 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

mvjayhawk (anonymous) says...

that "analysis" is unnecessary....we all know and see what's going on. Our D-Line is learing how to make plays and difference maker plays in games....McClinton knew how to do that, and now Johnson, Greene, Blakesly and Parish are having to learn that....and they're getting better no doubt. Laptad is doing a better job at pass rushing....it just needs to be more consistent. Yes our LBs are having a worse year...(part of that is the push that McClinton provided)...but i thought they were teriffic yesterday. If Rivera gets it going, then we're a total force again. The secondary is more of the mystery...but it can be explained: no more Aquib Talib, who made plays everywhere..not just down the field...and Harper's injury. Barfield, just a freshman, was burned repeatedly vs USF and Sam Houston St....and then Harper, returinng from a tough head/neck injury, looked rusty yesterday. He'll improve and so will Barfield.I think one of the big problems with this team, that no one really talks about, is the kicking game. Way, way too inconsistent on coverage, and our returns are horrible. we haven't had a decent kickoff return this year...what is going on Mr. Herford? no spark, he never hits the hole....if he gets to the 25, it's a good return. Patterson, all of a sudden has happy feet...and he doesn't catch near enough balls anymore. Get the ball, make ONE move, and then go...it's really that simple. Our kicking game is just nowhere near where it needs to be, and we will lose a game we shouldn't, if it doesn't get better fast.

October 5, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

troutsee (anonymous) says...

Sorry to disagree but at this point our defense stinks. With 9 of 11 returning starters, the blame has to go onto our defensive scheme, and that points directly at coaching, i.e. Clint Bowen, the defensive backs coach, and Mangino. What I have seen over the first five games is our corners playing too far off the wideouts, giving opposing QBs toss-and-catch easy 5-10 yard gains. That type of defense simply can't go forward. Opposing offensive coordinators are consistently outcoaching our defensive coordinator. We are not ball hawking. We are sitting back in a prevent stature the whole game. The philosophy seems to be...keep the receivers in front of you, hope the QB misfires or the receivers drop the ball, and then make the tackle. Such a philosophy is doomed for disaster. In addition, the lack of speed in the front four, especially at the ends is obvious. But, hey, we had one of the best defenses in the nation last year with the same personnel, so it must be the scheme and the coaching.

October 5, 2008 at 8:55 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JayViking (anonymous) says...

I agree with mvjayhawk. Special teams (especially Kick Returns) worry me more than our defense. The poor field position (and lack of spark) don't do much to help out our offense when it is struggling. It also hurts us really badly when we're forced to punt and the opposing team gets several possessions at the 50 or slightly in our territory (see ISU game!!).

October 5, 2008 at 10:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

lance1jhawk (anonymous) says...

troutsee, I think you are dead on with your analysis of the D. Clint Bowen needs to bring his D-backs up and start smacking people. This prevent defense we are playing (and lack of pass rush) is allowing the opposing quarterback way to much time to just pick us apart.

October 5, 2008 at 11:21 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BrockIII (anonymous) says...

We are going to give up 60 points to ou, ut, ttu and MU if our D continues to play like this. If we can't get a reliable pass rush going and our secondary is that fragile, we are going to get killed.

October 5, 2008 at 11:40 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

hawk_bred20 (anonymous) says...

troutsee - I think the coaches have been put in a tough spot. I was pretty upset yesterday, watching our corners play loose coverage and giving them quick outs, but then I watch our corners get burned over and over and I start to realize why they might be playing soft. If 3/4ths of the Big 12 quarterbacks get guys open on the fly like Iowa St. did yesterday, then we will HAVE to play off. It's a dilemma, I guess I'm still in the minority that thinks our secondary just isn't as good without Talib in there.

October 5, 2008 at 5:17 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

troutsee (anonymous) says...

hawk-bred, good point, a big dilemma. Our offense better be cooking every game. It's still hard for me to believe that Talib and McMillian made that much difference.....I mean, it's like night and day...the difference between last year and this year. I still think it's the coaching philosophy.

October 5, 2008 at 6:31 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JBurtin (anonymous) says...

The Bowen doubters are going to end up looking really stupid before all is said and done.He really hasn't done anything different schematically then we did last year. The cornerbacks played soft near the sidelines, but reacted and came up fast on the receivers when the ball was thrown short.Playing like that was what allowed Talib to bait the quarterback in the Orange bowl into giving up a pick six, and put the big hit on Bowman at Oklahoma State. It's why Harris was able to make so many fantastic tackles for loss.The difference is simply that our corners have been playing tentatively and not contesting the ball before it gets to the receiver, and the DE's have not been getting pressure to bat some of those balls down.People calling for Bowen's head were probably calling for Young's head just a couple of years ago when his pass defense was getting torched much worse than this year's. Many people seem to have made up their minds about Bowen before he was even hired, and are now looking for anything they can to prove themselves right.I don't know if we'll ever come together this year (though I think we're starting to), but in time Bowen is going to prove to be every bit as effective a coach as Young ever was. I find it hard to believe that anybody would want to jump off the bandwagon this early in his career. Especially when there's an obvious reason why the defense was having some struggles.We have two good corners on this team, just not three or four, and of the two that we have, neither of them is the playmaker that Talib was. Unless you just love the taste of foot in your mouth, I'd consider holding off judgement for a while.

October 5, 2008 at 6:48 p.m. ( | suggest removal )