Advertisement
Advertisement
Eight teams that can win six
- UT might be better without Durant (03-20-08)
- Key for Kansas: depth (03-20-08)
- Volunteers - like Gators - unselfish (03-20-08)
- UCLA has lot to love (03-20-08)
- Loaded Tigers have weapons aplenty (03-20-08)
- Hansbrough has Heels humming along (03-20-08)
- Padgett's return bolsters Louisville (03-20-08)
- Xavier as experienced as balanced (03-20-08)
- 2008 NCAA Tournament preview »
All it takes to win a national title is to win six consecutive games. That's all. It sounds so easy, yet only one of 341 NCAA Division I basketball schools can call itself a national champion when the final nets are cut down. That's a better measure of the difficulty of the task.
To win it all requires negotiating through various styles of play along the way, with each opponent representing a tougher challenge than the last.
Staying alive demands an experienced enough roster not to melt under the pressure and flexible enough personnel to combat teams that boast different strengths.
It takes a physically and mentally healthy roster, a team peaking at the right time and legs that are well conditioned, yet not burned out. When the legs go, the shots fall short, and so do the national title aspirations.
Taking all those factors into consideration, the Journal-World selected, before the brackets were released, eight schools that have teams capable of going all the way. In alphabetical order, they are: Kansas, Louisville, Memphis, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, UCLA and Xavier.
Whenever a list is made, the instant response becomes "Why not ...," as in, why not Georgetown?
The late Al McGuire and fellow coaching legend Larry Brown have at least two things in common: 1. They both won the national title in the last college game they coached; 2. They repeatedly said it required a heavy dose of luck to win those national championships, McGuire at Marquette in 1977, Brown at Kansas in 1988.
Well, Georgetown is due for some bad luck after having extraordinarily good luck from last-second officiating calls or non-calls in Big East victories against West Virginia, Villanova and Marquette.
Other than the luck factor, the Hoyas do have a lot going for them. Coach John Thompson III inherited his father's feel for the game and presence with players. He uses elements of the Princeton offense with Big East talent, a winning combination. Reserve big man Patrick Ewing Jr. is playing extremely inspired basketball. Yet, the backcourt, though improved, might not be consistent enough to make a six-game run.
In the Big East tournament, the Hoyas blew out Villanova despite not getting a point from leading scorer Roy Hibbert, a 7-foot-2 senior center, but finished second to a hot Pittsburgh team in the conference tourney.
Why not Wisconsin? Too slow.
Why not Duke? It's too painful to think how many Coach K commercials we all would have to endure if the sainted one bagged another national title. Also, the Blue Devils don't have a consistent low-post scoring force, which leaves them a little too reliant on the three-point shot. In its first 32 games, Duke attempted 747 three-point shots, compared to 474 for North Carolina and 547 for Kansas in their first 32 games. It's tough to string together six games of hot shooting from long range.
True, Tennessee shoots even more three-pointers than Duke, but since Bruce Pearl keeps his importance to the world in better perspective and would be a welcome face on any commercial, the Volunteers get the nod for inclusion.
More like this
- Padgett's return bolsters Louisville March 20, 2008
- UCLA has lot to love March 20, 2008
- Vikings sent packing; UNLV next 1 comment / March 21, 2008
- Volunteers - like Gators - unselfish March 20, 2008
- UT might be better without Durant March 20, 2008












Comments
rockchalk_dpu (anonymous) says...
Keegan,
I feel that this was an interesting article and I do agree that winning 6 games against top competition over 3 weeks is difficult. However I feel that you did not devote enough time was devoted to identifying why each these 8 teams are better suited to win a National Title and too much on why certain teams were left of the list.
That being said, how do you include UCLA on the list and exclude Georgetown for being "too lucky"? Did you not watch the Stanford and Cal games or were those calls correct? While I hope you are right about Georgetown, I cannot help but think they could pose a match-up problem for KU if we advance that far given their size inside.
Rock Chalk!
NC in '08
March 20, 2008 at 10:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
okjhok (anonymous) says...
I would take Louisville and Texas off that list. Both way too inconsistent to win six straight against solid competition. While some of those others are inconsistent, they have more talent to fall back on.
March 20, 2008 at 10:55 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
cure4cf (anonymous) says...
ohjhok....you going to take lousiville cause of being inconsistent but other teams that are inconsistent have more talent to fall back on? UL has one the deepest benches in the nation...so they have more talent to fall back on
March 20, 2008 at 11:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
okjhok (anonymous) says...
Wrong...they have more capable players than most teams, but that doesn't translate into better top-level talent, which they are short on.
March 21, 2008 at 9:25 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )