Advertisement
Advertisement
Dallas A center from France who averaged five points and 3.1 rebounds was taken by Charlotte at No. 20.
And Darrell Arthur sat.
A forward who grew up in the Congo and lived in a house with no electricity or running water went to Seattle at No. 24.
And Arthur sat.
Certainly, San Antonio would take a chance on Arthur. He did help Kansas win the NCAA championship, and Spurs general manager R.C. Buford was a member of the coaching staff that won a title with Kansas in 1988. Buford's son, Chase, was one of Arthur's teammates this past season.
The Spurs chose George Hill. You've heard of Hill. He was the leading scorer for IUPUI (Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis).
By the time Arthur was taken with the 27th pick of the first round, the raucous crowd at New York's Madison Square Garden was relieved. His embarrassment was even too much for them to endure.
What happened? How did a player projected by many to go in the teens barely squeeze into the first round?
The easy explanation is the kidney. Nothing showed up on the NBA's physical. Arthur played with this undisclosed condition at Kansas.
But when teams heard about it and requested lab work, Arthur declined. Red flags were raised. The former South Oak Cliff, Texas, star relented and allowed Washington's medical staff to do a complete workup. He was cleared.
It came too late. As one general manager told me late Wednesday evening, Arthur was "dropping like a stone."
But there is more to this. French forward Nicolas Batum failed a stress test in one of his workouts and was forced to undergo a battery of cardiological tests. He went two spots ahead of Arthur.
Arthur is an excellent athlete. He has a nice touch and a beautiful turnaround jumper. He can knock down the 17-foot jumper and finish around the basket.
But he's not much of a rebounder and is a poor passer. Some personnel people mentioned that he seemed to coast through parts of games.
Arthur did not impress in his individual workouts. A bad back kept him from practicing for some teams.
It was no way to win the hearts and minds of NBA general managers.
The deepest position of this draft was power forward. Arthur is better right now than some of the forwards taken ahead of him.
But will he be better two to three years from now? The majority of teams weren't convinced. They determined his upside wasn't as great.
Other athletes have begun their professional careers in similar fashion and gone on to success. Arthur may do the same.
But on this night, Darrell Arthur sat and watched most of the first round pass him by.
More like this
- Self debates NBA's top draft picks 36 comments / June 22, 2008
- The relocation of Shady 31 comments / June 25, 2008
- Keegan: Arthur gets shaft in draft 25 comments / June 27, 2008
- Chalmers officially moving on 24 comments / June 16, 2008
- Woodling: NBA Draft a joke 41 comments / June 29, 2008
Comments
JJHAWK (anonymous) says...
If the general tone of this is correct, that Arthur's draft position was motivated by GM's perception of his skill set, what does that say for Self's (and others) perceptions that Arthur was a early first rounder? Especially when those perceptions were based on data being received from "trusted" NBA sources. Myself, I find it more likely that Arthur's skill set was insufficient to overcome the panic generated by the late rumor, a rumor apparently given legs by Arthur's own actions (or his marketing team's actions) . . . "when teams heard about it and requested lab work, Arthur declined. Red flags were raised." Do I wish both Mario and Darrel would have come back for another year? Of course. With them we would be top ten and once again in the hunt. Do I think they made mistakes by leaving early? Hey, everyone needs to follow their dreams - their way. I feel a little for Mario. While people said early on he was a late first rounder or early second, he was given information that the former was going to happen, enough so that he kept his name in the draft. And dear old Dad went along, so I'm assuming the feedback was pretty strong. Am I upset? Naw! They are both good kids, marvelous basketball talents and they certainly have made KU basketball thrilling and a thing of beauty these last few years. Plus I believe they are going to do well long-term in the league.go hawks!
June 29, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
frompekka2sasha (anonymous) says...
This article is hogwash. The reason he wasn't drafted early is only because of the kidney in question. This is the NBA and they aren't going to trust Bill Self's word the night of the draft over tests showing that something was wrong. His agent was not an effective communicator and that is most important part of his job. He should have "oversold" and "overcommunicated" every bit of information about his player. That's what he is being paid to do!
June 29, 2008 at 10:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bobsarobot (anonymous) says...
not sure what the point of JJayhawk's opening paragraph is supposed to be. five jayhawks were drafted and russell is getting a look from houston. sounds like coach self and his staff developed some great players. did shady deserve to go higher in the draft, of course he did. but hey, they are all in the NBA now and living out their dreams. people who criticize the decisions of college basketball players with the benefit of hindsight are a bunch of jokers. worry about yourself rather than acting like you know so much more than everyone else, coach self and staff included.also, what does having no running water or electricity have to do with being taken ahead of arthur? are we to intuit that the NBA team broke some unwritten rule where you have to draft players from more developed areas first? what about in-house technology as a deciding factor? "surprisingly, chalmers was picked ahead of chris douglas roberts despite the fact that the chalmers' household did not have the latest blueray home entertainment system like cdr's family".
June 29, 2008 at 11:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
FlaHawk (anonymous) says...
DA got a bum deal, but in buseiness perception is reality to that person(s). DA is not agressive on the court and his pesonality is not this way either.The NBA works on a risk model and DA lazyness, work ethic and poor hoice of an agent to communicate his positives for him. He is immature compared to his peers.The NBA is full of immature players that never overcome thier raps (legit or bum). It is now up to DA to show the NBA what he can do. Unfortunately, getting blasted by 30 points a night at Memphis will be hard to shine,.DA ould have improved his draft potential with another year at KU, but that opportunity is gone now. He has to change others perception or he will be out of the NBA in a year or two. He has great upside potential, but he has to work hard at it and this will be a new skill to learn for him!go da! go hawks!
June 29, 2008 at 11:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
jaybate (anonymous) says...
I went into a funk trying to explain why Arthur was not drafted sooner. I attempted several posts. I had great reasons pro AND con. But I could not persuade myself of anything. So I hit delete and waited some more. Here is what I have concluded.1. The only reason Arthur seems to have been drafted low is that the hype machine lead him and us to expect him to go from 10-20. The hype machine hypes guys for all kinds of reasons. The hype machine seems to have to have some hyped players at every position, even if players at the position are not fabulous. Also, NBA GMs hype a guy in order to distract other GMs from who they really want. A draft is a strategic event. So: take away our hyped expectations, and in some strategic deception, and you are left, in Arthur's case without great expectations, unless he really does possess the key ingredients NBA teams are hot for. The question is: what are they hot for?2. High draft choices promise EITHER strong matchup advantages at a position, OR the ability to hold their own at an anchor position (PG or Center) against top competition for a number of years. Rush exemplifies the former. He just bigger and stronger than other 2s, if he can play the position. Rose exemplifies the latter. While he certainly will not dominate the way a Magic Johnson, or an Oscar Robertson did, you can probably count on him holding down the PG the same way Jason Kidd has, while you look for the match up advantages at other positions. Arthur promises neither of the above. He offers no matchup advantage to the usual NBA 4, and he will probably take a couple of years to develop into a starter who can hold his own for 5-6 years.
June 29, 2008 at 3:39 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
tdomine (anonymous) says...
In this era when perception equals reality, if you give the GM's even an iota of doubt, it will cost you major dollars. I'm mystified how GMs can squander draft picks on underperformers from sub-standard leagues or tall people who only started to learn about basketball once they hit 6'10", yet pass on a proven champion because of scares, but I'm thinking that a combination of health, lack of season-long dominance on a very balanced team, and perhaps a less than gut-busting performance at the team trials spelled doom for DA.Like Mark Jackson said on draft night, the only thing left to do is go out and prove everyone wrong. Time to posterize the entire league, DA. No quarter!
June 29, 2008 at 3:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
jaybate (anonymous) says...
3. It means nothing that other players at other positions were drafted ahead of him. Almost every team is drafting for position to some extent. So a team takes George Hill before Arthur, because they need a guard and because Arthur offers neither a decisive match up advantage nor immediate help at the 1 or 5.4. Darrell Arthur, though he was a cornerstone of our team, often disappeared and never beasted; this suggests a player coasting on match up advantages in college that does not have his head completely under control. If those match up advantages disappear in the pros (as Arthur's may) a pro team would be left with a mental, not a physical project player. Clearly, NBA teams opt for physical projects to take risks on. I'm not saying this is smart. It probably isn't, since heart and mind in persons of similar physical skills are almost always decisive over a long season and in a play off series.5. Arthur had an untimely rumor of a kidney problem that probably scared some teams, but the Washington Wizards Knew the score and did not take him, so the kidney problem seems a lesser contributor.6. Arthur did not play well in work outs for whatever reason and this seems to have triggered the beginning of th fall. It did not mean he was a bad player, but it increased the percentage weights of all the other issues. 7. Arthur is part of a pending investigation into a high school grade changing allegation. This perhaps had some minor influence. Who wants a PR distraction, unless the player promises certain match up advantages, or promises to be an anchor player immediately for a number of years?When you set aside emotion and look at the above 7 factors, it is frankly a wonder he was taken in the first round.This is not to say that Arthur is going to fail in the NBA. I believe that in 2-3 years a lot of teams are going to be wishing they had taken him in the top 15.Why? Because Darrell Arthur is a very good big for being so young. Not many sophmore 4s can anchor a D1 team to a national championship. Noah and Horford couldn't. They couldn't dominate until late in their junior years. If Arthur had come back to KU for his junior year, KU would almost certainly have gone to the Final Four again and probably would have won...if he improved as much between sophmore and junior year, as most bigs do. But as a pro, he would still be only 6'9", which means he would have been in much the same postions as Noah and Horford...capable of playing, but not likely to dominate in the NBA.So; on the day Arthur was drafted, these were the issues at play in his drafting, as I see them, and they did in the end drag him down.
June 29, 2008 at 3:50 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CMKUbLu304 (anonymous) says...
It doesn't really matter when he was drafted. He's got a guaranteed contract and he's going to be making WAY more money than any of us anyway. The only thing he has to do is play. Everything else will fall in place because he's a champ. Congrats to you Darrell. Don't worry about people trying to explain why you fell. Just go out and play the game you love.
June 29, 2008 at 5:59 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
frompekka2sasha (anonymous) says...
CMK- I just hope he gets a better agent before it's time to re-up for another contract. His agent didn't communicate well enough with teams that were, indeed, questioning his kidney ailment. I thought that part has been very clear about his fall in the draft. Ric Bucher, Bill Self and others have all pointed this out already so that is the only thing anyone should be debating.
June 29, 2008 at 9:09 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
hawkfan4life (anonymous) says...
Isn't Self supposed to help his players choose good representation (agent) for themselves? Why is it that when the decision was made to keep his name in the draft someone didn't help him to select a better agent? Who is his agent anyway, I heard he just hired the guy the weekend prior to the draft? How come Darrell's people didn't speak up for him and how come he didn't have any assistance to help him select someone who would speak up for him sooner?
June 30, 2008 at 10:32 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
justanotherfan (anonymous) says...
The draft is not an exact science. Check out a draft do over sometime. People find big time players in the teens, twenties and second round. There are busts scattered throughout the lottery. Even strong drafts (like 2003) have their busts.2003 Draft1.Cleveland--LeBron James2. Detroit (from Memphis)--Darko Milicic 3. Denver--Carmelo Anthony 4. Toronto--Chris Bosh 5. Miami--Dwyane Wade 6. LA Clippers--Chris Kaman 7. Chicago--Kirk Hinrich 8. Milwaukee(from Atlanta)--T.J. Ford 9. New York--Michael Sweetney 10. Washington--Jarvis Hayes Boris Diaw (21), Josh Howard (29), Leandro Barbosa (28) and David West (18) all were drafted outside the lottery in this draft. I bet NY and Detroit would take one of those guys in a heartbeat.
June 30, 2008 at 12:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Kirk (anonymous) says...
Can't help but think that staying would have helped his status down the road.He (and Mario) LEFT because they were going to get drafted so high, remember?Uh, yeah.
June 30, 2008 at 9:04 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
garybedore (Gary Bedore) says...
Isn't Self supposed to help his players choose good representation (agent) for themselves? Why is it that when the decision was made to keep his name in the draft someone didn't help him to select a better agent? Who is his agent anyway, I heard he just hired the guy the weekend prior to the draft? How come Darrell's people didn't speak up for him and how come he didn't have any assistance to help him select someone who would speak up for him sooner?-- I don't know much about his agent good or bad, but don't blame Self. These modern players who have strong AAU influences do not trust the college coach to check for them or help pick their agents.Many times they believe the coach will lie about things to get them to stay another year. Welcome again to college athletes 2008.
June 30, 2008 at 10:41 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lee3022 (anonymous) says...
I don't think representation or position had much to do with the drop by Arthur. He seemed to favor Washington and Philadelphia as the only two he conveyed his revised kidney creatin levels to. With Jason Thompson and Robin Lopez jumping up the board both Philadelphia and Washington took a very talented center that would not likely have been available to them.The teams focus on who works out for them and who accommodates their concerns. It sounds like the strategy of using Washington and Philadelphia as his floor was flawed but who can tell. Disinformation is really strong at this time of year. A more seasoned agent may have done things differently but maybe Darrell's mom insisted on this stategy and chose this agent because he would acquiesces to her. Coach Self is not running this process. This is not on him. In any event Arthur has a home and has plently of opportunity to earn minutes and prove everyone ahead of #27 foolish. It is still on him.
June 30, 2008 at 11:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )